This Law Takes Effect Today!! Ammo Fees take a 400% Hike!

Published on July 1, 2025
Duration: 25:49

This video discusses the 400% increase in California's ammunition background check fee, raising it from $1 to $5, effective July 1st. It also analyzes the Ninth Circuit's ruling in the Nenv Bonta case, which found California's 'one gun a month' law unconstitutional. The discussion highlights the legal basis for these changes, including the financial unsustainability of the background check system and the application of the Bruen decision's historical tradition standard to firearm regulations.

Quick Summary

California's ammunition background check fee has surged by 400%, now costing $5 per check, effective July 1st. This increase stems from the system's financial struggles. Concurrently, the Ninth Circuit declared the state's 'one gun a month' law unconstitutional, citing Second Amendment rights and a lack of historical precedent.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Ammo Fee Hike & Nenv Bonta Ruling Overview
  2. 00:29Introduction: July 1st Law Changes
  3. 01:24Ammunition Background Check Fee Increase Explained
  4. 02:47Financial Reasons for the Fee Increase
  5. 05:47Process of the Fee Change
  6. 08:52Effectiveness of Background Check System
  7. 11:33Nenv Bonta Lawsuit: One Gun A Month Rule
  8. 13:30Impact of Bruen Decision on Gun Laws
  9. 15:32Facial vs. As Applied Challenges
  10. 16:56Historical Analogues Standard
  11. 19:17Assembly Bill 1078: Three Guns A Month
  12. 20:46Plurality of Arms & Second Amendment
  13. 21:27Impact of Nenv Bonta Ruling on AB 1078
  14. 24:21Summary and Next Steps

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the new fee for ammunition background checks in California?

Effective July 1st, the fee for ammunition background checks in California has increased by 400%, rising from $1 to $5 per check. This change is due to the financial unsustainability of the system.

Why did California's 'one gun a month' law get struck down?

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled California's 'one gun a month' law unconstitutional because it violates the Second Amendment's protection of the right to possess multiple firearms and lacks historical support in U.S. tradition.

What is the significance of the Bruen decision for firearm laws?

The Bruen decision established that firearm regulations must be consistent with the nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation. Courts now analyze new laws by looking for historical analogues to justify restrictions.

How does the Nenv Bonta ruling affect proposed legislation like AB 1078?

The Nenv Bonta ruling, which found the 'one gun a month' law unconstitutional, could impact legislation like AB 1078 (three guns a month). However, AB 1078 includes a provision that it won't take effect unless the Nenv Bonta opinion is overturned.

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from CRPA TV

View all →