They Made Ammo a Privilege… Courts Are Finally Calling It Out

Published on March 5, 2026
Duration: 0:36

This video provides an update on the Rhodey v. Bonta case, a legal challenge against California's ammunition regulations stemming from Proposition 63. The Ninth Circuit has scheduled oral arguments for March 25th, indicating significant movement in the case. The CRPA is actively involved and will be present for the proceedings.

Quick Summary

The Rhodey v. Bonta case challenges California's Proposition 63 ammunition regulations. Oral arguments for a Ninth Circuit en banc hearing are scheduled for March 25th, marking significant progress in the legal battle against these restrictions.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Rhodey V. Bonta Update
  2. 00:10Ninth Circuit Oral Arguments Scheduled
  3. 00:20California Ammunition Regulations Challenge

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Rhodey v. Bonta case about?

The Rhodey v. Bonta case is a legal challenge specifically targeting California's ammunition regulations, which were established by Proposition 63 in 2016. The CRPA is actively involved in this legal battle.

When are the Ninth Circuit oral arguments for Rhodey v. Bonta?

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has scheduled oral arguments for the Rhodey v. Bonta case, an en banc hearing, for Wednesday, March 25th. This marks a significant step in the legal challenge.

What is Proposition 63 in California?

Proposition 63 is a California ballot proposition passed in 2016 that introduced various gun control measures, including significant regulations on ammunition sales and possession. This proposition is the subject of the Rhodey v. Bonta legal challenge.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from CRPA TV

View all →