US Navy Sailor Wrongfully Convicted For Illegally Selling Machine Guns

Published on October 28, 2022
Duration: 19:51

This video details the wrongful conviction of a US Navy sailor, Patrick Tate, for alleged illegal machine gun and destructive device transfers and possession. It critically examines the ATF's interpretation of laws regarding demilitarized parts, constructive possession of grenade launcher components, and inert training devices, arguing that Tate's actions were misunderstood and misrepresented, leading to a severe sentence.

Quick Summary

US Navy sailor Patrick Tate was convicted for illegal machine gun and destructive device offenses, including charges related to PPS43 kits, M203/M79 grenade launchers, and an RPG-7 training device. The case highlights controversial ATF interpretations of demilitarization standards and constructive possession.

Chapters

  1. 00:04Introduction & Case Overview
  2. 00:58Black Dog Arsenal Business
  3. 01:48Warrant & Arrest
  4. 02:19Charges: Illegal Machine Gun Transfer
  5. 03:06PPS43 Kits Explained
  6. 04:00Demilitarization Standards
  7. 04:51Criminal Informant's Role
  8. 05:31M240 Trainer Incident
  9. 06:08ATF Agent's Investigation
  10. 06:20The Single Cut Kit
  11. 07:02Search Findings: M203 & M79
  12. 07:50Title I Firearm Status
  13. 08:43Constructive Possession Argument
  14. 09:45ATF Assembly for Jury
  15. 10:26Charge: RPG-7 Possession
  16. 10:34RPG-7 Inert Training Device
  17. 11:37ATF Lab Modifications
  18. 12:10Barrel Sleeve Modification
  19. 12:59Uncharged Items: MAC Flats
  20. 13:52Wet Saw Accusation
  21. 14:30Master Chief Testimony
  22. 15:34Conviction & Sentencing Guidelines
  23. 15:53Seizure of Funds
  24. 16:19Call to Action: Defense Fund
  25. 17:57Contacting Politicians
  26. 18:26Sharing the Video
  27. 18:44Raising Awareness
  28. 19:07Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

What were the main charges against US Navy sailor Patrick Tate?

Patrick Tate was charged with illegal transfer and possession of machine guns, specifically involving PPS43 kits. He also faced charges for possession of destructive devices, including M203 and M79 grenade launchers, and an RPG-7 training device.

How does the ATF define a demilitarized machine gun receiver?

The ATF generally requires a machine gun receiver to be cut with a torch in three different positions at an angle to be considered demilitarized and not readily convertible into a functional firearm.

What is 'constructive possession' in the context of firearms law?

Constructive possession means having the intent and ability to exercise dominion and control over an item, even if it's not in your physical possession. In firearms cases, it can apply if components of a destructive device are stored separately but within the same dwelling.

Can an inert training device like an RPG-7 lead to legal trouble?

Yes, even inert training devices can lead to charges if the ATF modifies them to become functional. In Patrick Tate's case, an RPG-7 with a hole was patched and modified to fire a different caliber round, leading to his conviction.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Mrgunsngear Channel

View all →