Worst Judge Interpretation Ever? 2A Does NOT Cover Obtaining Firearms?!?

Published on November 14, 2023
Duration: 10:22

This video critically examines a federal judge's interpretation of the Second Amendment, arguing it incorrectly limits the right to 'keep and bear arms' to possession and carrying, excluding the right to obtain firearms. The speaker, drawing on historical definitions and legal precedent like the Heller decision, disputes the judge's reasoning that waiting periods are consistent with historical firearm regulation. The analysis highlights the distinction between possessing and obtaining a firearm, and critiques the judge's reliance on 'expert opinions' that lack historical grounding.

Quick Summary

A federal judge controversially ruled that the Second Amendment's plain text does not cover the waiting period for firearm purchases, arguing 'keep' and 'obtain' are not equivalent. The interpretation suggests the right is to possess and carry, not necessarily to acquire without delay.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Worst Judge Interpretation Ever?
  2. 00:25Sponsor: Sonoran Desert Institute (SDI)
  3. 01:13Judge John L. Kane's Background
  4. 01:47Colorado Waiting Period Law Case
  5. 02:18Judge's Analysis on Heller
  6. 03:06Judge's Reasoning on Waiting Periods
  7. 03:50Definitions of 'Keep' and 'Bear'
  8. 04:59Right to Possess vs. Obtain
  9. 07:14Judge Citing 'Expert Opinions'
  10. 08:37Critique and Call for Appeal
  11. 09:38Closing Remarks

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the Second Amendment cover the right to obtain firearms?

A federal judge controversially ruled that the Second Amendment's plain text does not cover the waiting period for firearm purchases, arguing 'keep' and 'obtain' are not equivalent. The interpretation suggests the right is to possess and carry, not necessarily to acquire without delay.

What is the Heller decision's relevance to firearm acquisition rights?

The Heller decision examined the 'normal meaning' of 'keep' and 'bear' arms, defining them as to 'retain' or 'have in custody' and to 'carry,' respectively. This analysis is used to argue that the immediate receipt of a firearm is not covered by the Second Amendment's plain text.

What is the legal argument against Colorado's firearm waiting period?

The argument is that Colorado's three-day waiting period for firearm purchases is unconstitutional. Critics contend that the Second Amendment protects the right to acquire firearms, and that waiting periods are not consistent with historical firearm regulations.

How did the judge define 'keep' and 'bear' arms?

The judge referenced historical dictionaries, defining 'keep' as to retain or have in custody, and 'bear' as to carry, particularly for confrontation. This definition was used to differentiate between possessing existing weapons and obtaining new ones.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News

View all →