Wow, Lawsuit Claims Glocks Are Too Concealable!

Published on April 19, 2025
Duration: 5:28

Colion Noir, an expert firearms instructor, analyzes a lawsuit claiming Glocks are too concealable. He argues this lawsuit, targeting Glock for marketing concealable firearms, is an attempt to circumvent the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) and bankrupt the gun industry through legal attrition, rather than seeking justice. The video also touches on the AKT1 Blackout hearing protection and broader issues of content suppression.

Quick Summary

Glock is being sued for its pistols being too concealable, a feature that also makes them popular for law enforcement and personal defense. This lawsuit is argued to be an attempt to bypass the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) by focusing on marketing and design, rather than product malfunction, shifting blame from the criminal to the manufacturer.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Glock Sued for Concealability
  2. 00:22News Report on Lawsuit
  3. 00:36Lawsuit Details & Opinion
  4. 01:15Suspect & NYC Lawsuit
  5. 01:47Supreme Court Precedent
  6. 02:19Legal Implications & Gun Industry
  7. 03:16Blaming Products & 2A Suppression
  8. 04:08AKT1 Hearing Protection & Conclusion
  9. 05:03Fighting Suppression of 2A Rights

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Glock being sued according to the lawsuit?

Glock is being sued because its pistols are allegedly too concealable. The lawsuit claims the company marketed its firearms as easy to carry, and this concealability is the basis for the legal action following the 2022 Brooklyn subway shooting.

What is the legal argument against suing gun manufacturers like Glock?

The argument is that suing manufacturers for making concealable firearms is akin to blaming the tool rather than the person using it. It's seen as an attempt to circumvent the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) by focusing on marketing and design rather than product malfunction.

What Supreme Court precedent is mentioned regarding protection?

The Supreme Court case Castle Rock v. Gonzalez (2005) is cited, establishing that police have no constitutional duty to protect individuals from harm. This precedent is contrasted with the ability to sue gun manufacturers for products that function as intended.

What is the purpose of the AKT1 Blackout hearing protection?

The AKT1 Blackout hearing protection is designed for enhanced safety and communication. It offers significant noise reduction (25 dB NRR), hearing enhancement, auto noise blocking, transparency mode, and Bluetooth audio for music and calls.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Colion Noir

View all →