270 Win vs 308 Win: ONE Clear Winner On Mild Steel

This video presents ballistics data for a 13.9-inch 6mm ARC rifle. The test fired 105-grain ammunition through a suppressor, achieving an average muzzle velocity of 2494.9 feet per second with a low standard deviation of 10.2. The data indicates excellent performance for factory ammunition out of this barrel length.

This video demonstrates a live-fire test of .44 Special Wadcutter ammunition fired from a Charter Arms .44 Bulldog revolver. Expert instruction is provided on loading the firearm and utilizing a Garmin Xero Chronograph to collect ballistic data, including average, minimum, and maximum velocities. The test concludes with a positive assessment of the performance.

This video demonstrates the use of a Smith & Wesson 629 Performance Center .44 Magnum revolver at an outdoor shooting range. Expertly handled by Mr. Madness, the session focuses on testing DoubleTap Ammunition using a Garmin Xero C1 Pro chronograph to measure projectile velocity. The footage highlights safe firearm handling and the collection of specific ballistics data for performance analysis.

This video provides a detailed comparison of five different brands of 55-grain M193 ammunition, evaluating their performance through two distinct AR-15 barrels. The analysis includes muzzle velocity, 30-shot group sizes, and AZ scores at 100 yards, offering valuable data for shooters seeking to understand brand-specific performance characteristics.

This guide details a methodical .22LR velocity test conducted by Buckeye Ballistics, comparing ammunition performance across three different Ruger barrel lengths (3.5", 10", and 18.5"). The test utilizes a Caldwell chronograph to gather empirical data on eight distinct .22LR loads, providing insights into how barrel length affects muzzle velocity and highlighting ammunition inconsistencies. The expert-level analysis emphasizes data collection and comparison for informed shooter decisions.

This video compares the terminal ballistics of 5.56x45mm NATO (M855 Green Tip) and 7.62x39mm (Tula) ammunition using gel block testing. The 5.56mm round demonstrated significant expansion and fragmentation, causing substantial damage to the test setup. The 7.62x39mm round, while also expanding, showed greater penetration, passing through the gel block and the table. The test highlights the different performance characteristics of these popular calibers in terms of tissue damage and penetration.

This video provides an expert-level comparison between the .44 Magnum and .50 Action Express calibers, featuring a Magnum Research Desert Eagle and a Ruger Super Redhawk. The host, demonstrating high authority, conducts a series of tests including penetration through lumber, steel, sand, and concrete, followed by ballistic gel testing with hollow-point rounds. The analysis highlights differences in muzzle energy, penetration, and wound channel, ultimately questioning the cost-to-performance ratio of the .50 AE.

This video provides an in-depth, experimental comparison between .223 Remington and 5.56x45mm NATO cartridges, utilizing a chronograph and various barrier materials. The host, demonstrating high expertise through empirical testing, reveals significant performance differences, particularly in barrier penetration, with 5.56x45mm NATO generally outperforming .223 Remington.

This video from Banana Ballistics explores the surprising lethality of "less lethal" shotgun ammunition. Through rigorous testing with ballistic gel and plywood, the host demonstrates that rounds like bean bags and high-velocity .410 rubber buckshot can cause significant damage, challenging the common perception of these rounds as entirely non-lethal. The testing highlights the importance of understanding ammunition performance beyond its intended classification.

This video provides an objective comparison of 9mm Luger, .40 S&W, and .45 ACP calibers through a series of rigorous tests including lumber, sand, concrete, and ballistics gel. The host, leveraging specialized equipment like a Garmin Xero C1 Pro chronograph and digital calipers, presents data on velocity, penetration, and expansion. While .40 S&W showed competitive performance in some tests, the analysis concludes with a preference for 9mm due to its higher capacity and lower recoil, highlighting the importance of practical considerations beyond raw ballistics.