How Many Pumpkins To STOP a 50 Cal Rifle?

This experiment tests how many pumpkins various firearms can penetrate. Handguns like the .45 ACP and .44 Magnum showed surprising stopping power, while high-velocity rifle rounds like the .223 and .308 fragmented or veered off course. The Desert Eagle chambered in .50 AE achieved the deepest penetration, stopping in the 13th pumpkin.

This video features a ballistic test comparing the terminal effects of a .22-250 caliber rifle round against a concrete block. The title explicitly states the caliber and the target, suggesting a destructive testing or terminal ballistics demonstration. The content likely focuses on the penetration and fragmentation capabilities of the .22-250 round when impacting a hard material.

This experiment tests the penetration power of various calibers through 500 stacked paper plates. Results show a significant difference in stopping power, with smaller calibers like .22 LR penetrating fewer plates than larger rifle rounds. The .50 BMG round, in particular, demonstrated extreme penetration, going through all plates and heavily damaging the target.

This video tests the bulletproof capabilities of an 8-inch solid glass ball against various calibers, from .22 LR to .50 BMG. While smaller calibers only chip the surface, larger rifle rounds cause significant shattering. Surprisingly, even when shattered, the glass fragments effectively stopped projectiles from reaching a dummy placed behind it, demonstrating an unexpected level of protection.

This video showcases the use of supersonic ammunition in what is described as the uploader's "loudest gun." The title suggests an emphasis on the auditory experience and the performance of high-velocity rounds, likely involving a powerful firearm known for its sound signature. The content probably features a range test or demonstration of this specific ammunition in the mentioned firearm.

This video appears to be a comparison of different ammunition types to determine which one produces the largest "boom," likely referring to muzzle blast and sound. Without a transcript, it's difficult to ascertain the specific firearms or calibers being tested, but the title suggests a focus on the auditory and potential concussive effects of various rounds. The content likely involves testing different loads, possibly in rifles, shotguns, or pistols, to demonstrate the differences in their sound output.

This video rigorously tests the self-defense capabilities of various airguns against a realistic human head ballistic target. The expert instructor demonstrates that low-power BB guns like the Daisy Red Rider offer minimal threat, while even full-auto CO2 BB guns fail to penetrate the skull. However, a high-velocity Gamo pellet rifle proves capable of causing significant damage, cracking the skull. The instructor concludes that BB guns are unsuitable for self-defense, and while pellet rifles are dangerous, they lack the immediate stopping power of conventional firearms.

This video tests the BulletSafe VP3 Level IIIA vest against various calibers up to .44 Magnum using a realistic human torso dummy. While the vest stopped all tested rounds, including a .44 Magnum and 12-gauge buckshot, significant backface deformation and blunt force trauma were evident, especially with higher-energy rounds. The dummy's shoulder blade was broken by buckshot, and severe bruising was indicated by the .44 Magnum impact.

This review of the Crosman DPMS SBR full-auto BB gun highlights its realistic AR-15 SBR aesthetics and select-fire capability. The host demonstrates its operation, including loading with a speedloader and the dual CO2 power system. Performance metrics like 1400 RPM and 430 FPS are discussed, along with its accuracy and destructive potential on targets like watermelons. The device is recommended for realistic training or plinking where live firearms are impractical.

This video tests the effectiveness and dangers of using a flare gun for self-defense. While a flare gun can ignite materials and cause internal damage to a ballistic torso, its single-shot capacity, slow reload, and high risk of starting fires make it an irresponsible and dangerous choice for defense. The test highlights the unpredictable nature and significant fire hazard associated with using flare guns in a defensive scenario.