Performance Testing : Kimber 2k11 Target vs Glock 17 gen 6 vs CZ Shadow 2

Published on May 10, 2026
Duration: 15:21

This video compares the Kimber 2011 Target, Glock 17 Gen 6, and CZ Shadow 2 in a performance shooting context, evaluating their effectiveness in drills like the build drill and a simulated USPSA stage. The presenter, an experienced shooter, emphasizes that firearm ergonomics and grip significantly impact performance more than trigger type alone. While the Kimber 2011 ultimately won due to the presenter's familiarity, the Glock 17 Gen 6 offered excellent value and performance, and the CZ Shadow 2, despite its excellent ergonomics, presented challenges due to its weight distribution and trigger profile for the presenter.

Quick Summary

In a performance shooting comparison, the Kimber 2011 Target, Glock 17 Gen 6, and CZ Shadow 2 were tested. The Kimber 2011 won due to the presenter's familiarity, but ergonomics and grip were deemed more critical than trigger type. The Glock 17 Gen 6 offered excellent value, while the CZ Shadow 2's front-heavy design and hooked trigger presented challenges.

Chapters

  1. 00:02Introduction: Action Type Debate
  2. 00:24Firearm Selections: Glock 17 Gen 6, CZ Shadow 2, Kimber 2011
  3. 00:31Criteria for 'Best' in Category
  4. 01:05Glock 17 Gen 6 Rationale
  5. 01:342011 Platform for Single Action Only
  6. 01:58Kimber 2011 as SAO Representative
  7. 02:02CZ Shadow 2 for DA/SA Crowd
  8. 02:25Performance Testing Caveats: Fluency & Ergonomics
  9. 02:41Weight & Ergonomics vs. Trigger
  10. 03:01Trigger Importance Debunked
  11. 03:13Stock Triggers Used
  12. 03:18Trigger Rating: 2011 > Glock > Shadow 2
  13. 03:39Patreon Shout-out & Video Origin
  14. 03:53Evaluation Drills: Build Drill & Stage
  15. 04:07USPSA Scoring Explained
  16. 04:347-Yard Build Drill Setup
  17. 04:47Kimber 2011: 7-Yard Build Drill Run 1
  18. 05:03Kimber 2011: 7-Yard Build Drill Run 2
  19. 05:21Kimber 2011: 7-Yard Build Drill Run 3
  20. 05:46Scores After 7-Yard Build Drill
  21. 05:5125-Yard Build Drill Setup
  22. 05:58Kimber 2011: 25-Yard Build Drill Run 1
  23. 06:34CZ Shadow 2: 25-Yard Build Drill Run 1
  24. 06:53Glock 17 Gen 6: 25-Yard Build Drill Run 1
  25. 07:05Stage Setup: 3 Positions, 15 Shots Max
  26. 07:25Stage Reloads & 2011 Advantage
  27. 07:50Kimber 2011: Stage Run 1 (Reload Issue)
  28. 08:32Glock 17 Gen 6: Stage Run 1
  29. 09:00CZ Shadow 2: Stage Run 1 (Missed Shot)
  30. 09:31Stage Standings After Run 1
  31. 09:45Kimber 2011: Stage Run 2 (Reload Issue)
  32. 10:02Glock 17 Gen 6: Stage Run 2 (Overcorrection)
  33. 10:56CZ Shadow 2: Stage Run 2
  34. 11:13Stage Run Comparison: Kimber vs. CZ
  35. 11:35Overall Results: Familiarity Wins
  36. 11:42Performance Breakdown: 7yd vs 25yd vs Stage
  37. 12:09Presenter's Final Rankings: Kimber #1
  38. 12:51Presenter's Final Rankings: Glock #2
  39. 13:35Price Comparison: 2011 vs Shadow 2 vs Glock
  40. 13:45Presenter's Final Rankings: Shadow 2 #3
  41. 13:53Shadow 2: Weight & Ergonomics Issues
  42. 14:34Shadow 2: Hooked Trigger Profile
  43. 15:07Conclusion & Viewer Engagement

Frequently Asked Questions

Which handgun performed best in the performance shooting test?

The Kimber 2011 Target ultimately performed best due to the presenter's high level of familiarity and confidence with the platform, leading to faster stage times and consistent accuracy. However, the Glock 17 Gen 6 offered excellent value and competitive performance, while the CZ Shadow 2, despite good ergonomics, presented challenges with its weight distribution and trigger profile for the presenter.

What factors are more important than trigger type in handgun performance?

According to the presenter, firearm ergonomics and grip are more critical than trigger type for shooting performance. How well a gun fits the shooter's hand, the ability to achieve a consistent grip, and the stability of the support hand are paramount, often outweighing the nuances of trigger pull weight or feel.

How do the Kimber 2011, Glock 17 Gen 6, and CZ Shadow 2 compare in price?

The Glock 17 Gen 6 is the most budget-friendly at approximately $620. The CZ Shadow 2 Optics Ready is priced around $1,300. The Kimber 2011 models are the most expensive, typically selling for $2,000 to $2,100.

What were the main criticisms of the CZ Shadow 2 in the performance test?

The CZ Shadow 2 was criticized for its front-heavy weight distribution, which made it feel like a 'hot dog on a stick' and more fatiguing to shoot rapidly. The presenter also disliked the hooked trigger profile, finding it less comfortable than the other tested firearms.

Related News

All News →

More Range & Competition Videos You Might Like

More from TheHumbleMarksman

View all →