Practical Pistol Show 68- Hard Stages too hard?

Published on August 7, 2015
Duration: 30:31

This episode of the Practical Pistol Show discusses stage design in competitive shooting, specifically addressing whether a stage is too difficult based on shooter performance. The hosts, including Grandmaster Tim and Grandmaster Nick, debate the criteria for bad stage design, emphasizing the importance of catering to the average shooter while still providing a challenge. They explore metrics like the percentage of shooters zeroing a stage and the impact of difficult shots on match fairness and fun.

Quick Summary

A pistol competition stage is considered too hard if a significant majority of competitors struggle to complete it without penalties or zeroing. This can be due to excessively long distances, small targets, or difficult shooting positions. Match directors should aim for stages that are challenging but fair, allowing most participants to engage targets effectively and maintain the 'fun factor' of the competition.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction & Topic Setup
  2. 00:52The Email: Hard Stage or Shitty Shooters?
  3. 01:49Matt Hopkins: Bad Stage Design Argument
  4. 02:12Nick Yanola: Suck It Up, Buttercup?
  5. 03:01Analyzing Stage Results & Classifications
  6. 03:54Tim's View: Disservice to Shooters
  7. 04:51Defining 'Too Hard' for Nick
  8. 06:17Personal Experience with Difficult Stages
  9. 07:07Fixed Time vs. Other Stage Types
  10. 08:00Appropriate Stage Difficulty & Fun Factor
  11. 09:37USPSA Nationals Stage Difficulty
  12. 11:36Borderline Unfair Stages
  13. 12:09A Good Match Mix of Stages
  14. 13:20Who Designs These Stages?
  15. 14:46Impact on Average Shooters
  16. 15:43Extreme Stage Example: 50yd Plate with No-Shoot
  17. 17:51Drawing the Line on Difficulty
  18. 18:17Hopkins' Rule of Thumb: 50% Zeroing
  19. 19:20Tim's Rule of Thumb: 50% Zeroing & Alphas
  20. 20:50Mike Foley Quote & Rulebook Necessity
  21. 21:36Shooting Questions: Barrel Heat
  22. 22:14Nick's Take: Barrel Heat Damage Unlikely
  23. 23:26Tim's Experience with Barrel Heat
  24. 24:25Hopkins: Suck It Up, Practice Hard
  25. 25:32Viewer Email: Ripping on Glocks?
  26. 26:18Trigger Finger Placement Discussion
  27. 27:24Is First Knuckle Placement Okay?
  28. 28:18Nick Uses Knuckle Placement
  29. 29:27Consistency in Finger Placement
  30. 30:06Upcoming Classes & Contact Info

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes a pistol competition stage 'too hard'?

A stage is generally considered too hard if a significant majority of competitors struggle to complete it without penalties or zeroing. This can be due to excessively long distances, small targets, difficult shooting positions, or complex target presentations that are not fair for the skill level of the participants.

How can match directors determine appropriate stage difficulty?

Match directors should consider the average skill level of their competitors. A stage that is too difficult can be unfun and doesn't effectively differentiate skill. A proposed guideline is that if 50% or more of shooters can zero a stage, it might be too easy, while stages where even the best struggle immensely are likely too hard.

Can shooting a handgun barrel too hot cause damage?

For typical competitive handgun shooting, such as in USPSA, the heat generated by the barrel is generally not sufficient to cause permanent damage. While barrels can become too hot to touch comfortably, they are unlikely to reach temperatures that would structurally compromise the metal, unlike some high-volume rifle fire.

Is trigger finger placement critical for accuracy in pistol shooting?

While many high-level shooters use the center of the pad, consistency and accuracy are paramount. Whether using the first knuckle or the center of the pad, as long as the shooter can maintain control and achieve desired accuracy, especially during double-action shots, the placement is generally acceptable.

Related News

All News →

More Range & Competition Videos You Might Like

More from Ben Stoeger

View all →