FMJ v. AP

Published on May 25, 2025
Duration: 1:00

This demonstration by Misha's Guns effectively contrasts the performance of Full Metal Jacket (FMJ) and Armor Piercing (AP) .30-06 ammunition. Firing from an M1 Garand at a steel plate, the video clearly shows the FMJ round creating only a surface mark, while the 1943 Lake City AP round penetrates the steel with a clean hole. The expert demonstrates proper handling of the M1 Garand and identification of vintage ammunition.

Quick Summary

In a test firing from an M1 Garand, FMJ .30-06 ammunition created only a surface mark on a steel target. Conversely, a 1943 Lake City AP .30-06 round successfully penetrated the steel plate, demonstrating the distinct performance difference between the two ammunition types.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: FMJ vs AP .30-06
  2. 00:13FMJ Test Fire on Steel Target
  3. 00:39AP Test Fire: Penetration Demonstrated
  4. 00:50Results Inspection: FMJ vs AP Impact

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the key visual difference between FMJ and AP .30-06 ammunition?

The primary visual distinction for the AP .30-06 round in this demonstration is its black tip. The FMJ round does not have this distinctive marking. Additionally, the AP round shown had a 'L C 4 3' headstamp, indicating Lake City production in 1943.

How did FMJ and AP .30-06 ammunition perform on a steel target?

When fired from an M1 Garand at a steel target, the FMJ .30-06 round created only a surface mark. In contrast, the AP .30-06 round successfully penetrated the steel plate, leaving a clean hole.

What rifle was used to test the FMJ and AP .30-06 ammunition?

The rifle used for testing the FMJ and AP .30-06 ammunition was a U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30, M1, commonly known as the M1 Garand. This gas-operated, semi-automatic rifle is chambered in .30-06 Springfield.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Misha’s Guns

View all →