Tapco Mini-14 Mags: Not Ready for Primetime...Yet

Published on June 4, 2010
Duration: 15:26

This review by nutnfancy critically assesses the first-generation Tapco polymer magazines for the Ruger Mini-14. Despite positive initial impressions regarding weight and aesthetics, extensive testing revealed significant reliability issues, primarily concerning inconsistent and lethargic ammunition feeding. The reviewer highlights potential causes including a weak magazine spring and dimensional issues, contrasting them with the reliable performance of Ruger's factory steel magazines. While acknowledging Tapco's potential for improvement, the Gen 1 magazines are deemed not ready for prime time.

Quick Summary

The first-generation Tapco Mini-14 polymer magazines are deemed unreliable due to inconsistent and lethargic ammunition feeding, often failing to chamber rounds properly. Potential causes include a weak magazine spring and dimensional issues. For optimal reliability, Ruger's factory steel magazines are recommended, despite their increased weight.

Chapters

  1. 00:03Mini-14 as a Tactical Rifle
  2. 00:54Magazine Choice is Critical
  3. 01:16Ruger Factory Steel Magazines
  4. 01:51Tapco Polymer Magazines Announced
  5. 02:05Tapco AK Mag Review
  6. 03:00Tapco Mini-14 Mags Released
  7. 03:43Tapco Mini-14 Mags: Not Recommended
  8. 04:05Testing Tapco Mini-14 Mags
  9. 04:38Unreliable Feeding Issues
  10. 05:00Lethargic Round Feeding
  11. 05:24Ammunition Compatibility
  12. 05:41Downloading Magazine Test
  13. 05:59Ruger Factory Mag Comparison
  14. 06:27Potential Causes: Feed Lips/Dimensions
  15. 07:01Floor Plate Design
  16. 07:24Spring Inspection
  17. 07:38Spring Comparison: Tapco vs. Ruger
  18. 08:21Failure to Feed Demonstration
  19. 09:30Nose Dives
  20. 09:42Magazine Wiggle
  21. 10:02Factory Mag Wiggle Reference
  22. 10:31Feeding Improvement Near Bottom
  23. 10:48Primary Issue: Magazine Spring
  24. 11:04Magazine Retention Hole Wear
  25. 11:43Lack of Steel Reinforcements
  26. 12:11Feed Angle Criticality
  27. 12:21Bummer Review
  28. 13:32Weight Comparison
  29. 13:40Call to Tapco to Fix
  30. 14:09Mini-14 Remains Outstanding
  31. 14:15Recommendation: Stick to Factory Mags

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main issues with the first-generation Tapco Mini-14 polymer magazines?

The primary issues are inconsistent and lethargic ammunition feeding, leading to failures to chamber rounds. This can manifest as nose dives into the feed ramp or rounds simply not presenting to the feed lips. The magazine retention hole also shows signs of wear and scraping.

Are Tapco Mini-14 polymer magazines reliable for the Ruger Mini-14 rifle?

According to this review, the first-generation Tapco Mini-14 polymer magazines are not reliable and are not recommended for use. They suffer from significant feeding issues that prevent positive chambering of ammunition.

What are the recommended magazines for the Ruger Mini-14?

For absolute reliability, the reviewer strongly recommends sticking with Ruger's factory steel magazines, specifically the 20-round and 30-round variants. These are considered the best option despite their added weight.

What might be causing the feeding problems in the Tapco Mini-14 Gen 1 magazines?

The reviewer suspects the main cause is a weak magazine spring. Other potential issues include dimensional inaccuracies within the magazine that cause bullet tips to drag, or possible feed lip problems, though the feed lips themselves appear strong.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from nutnfancy

View all →