Concealed Carry + Mass Shooting = More Carnage?

Published on December 26, 2012
Duration: 2:26

This video argues that concealed carriers can deter mass shootings by presenting a challenge to attackers. The speaker refutes common anti-gun arguments, such as the effectiveness of body armor and the idea that a concealed carrier would escalate a situation into a bloodbath. The core message is that an armed populace makes it harder for attackers to succeed.

Quick Summary

The argument that concealed carry escalates mass shootings is flawed; armed citizens present a challenge to attackers, diverting their attention and gunfire. Body armor is not a guarantee of safety, as even military and police wearing it can be injured or killed. Mass shooters often target 'gun-free zones' for unopposed attacks.

Chapters

  1. 00:08Media Rhetoric on Mass Shootings
  2. 00:19Challenging the 'Shootout' Narrative
  3. 00:34Pundits' Patronizing Arguments
  4. 00:46Aurora Shooting & Police Response
  5. 00:57Gun Control's Limited Impact
  6. 01:10Deterrence Through Armed Citizens
  7. 01:16Body Armor vs. Concealed Carry
  8. 01:35The Real Benefit of Concealed Carry
  9. 01:46Virginia Tech Example
  10. 02:00Shooter Psychology
  11. 02:08Why Shooters Choose Soft Targets

Frequently Asked Questions

Does concealed carry increase the danger in a mass shooting event?

The argument that concealed carry escalates a mass shooting into a bloodbath is challenged. The video posits that the presence of armed citizens creates a challenge for the shooter, potentially diverting their attention and gunfire, thereby offering an opportunity for unarmed individuals to escape.

How effective is body armor against mass shooters?

The video argues that body armor is not an infallible shield. It points out that military personnel and law enforcement wearing body armor still sustain injuries and fatalities, suggesting it does not guarantee invincibility for potential victims in active shooter scenarios.

Why do mass shooters target 'gun-free zones'?

Mass shooters often select 'gun-free zones' because these locations offer an unopposed environment. This behavior suggests that attackers are seeking situations where they will not face immediate armed resistance, indicating a desire to avoid challenges.

Is waiting for police the best strategy during a mass shooting?

The video suggests that waiting for law enforcement is no longer an acceptable primary strategy. It references incidents where mass casualties occurred despite police arriving quickly, implying that immediate self-defense or the presence of armed citizens is crucial.

Related News

All News →

More Self Defense Videos You Might Like

More from Colion Noir

View all →