Why You Should NOT Carry Mace with Your EDC! A Taurus Saved my Bacon in B'Ham! (INSIDE GUNS S2:E47)

Published on March 11, 2021
Duration: 19:08

This video discusses the pros and cons of carrying less-than-lethal options like pepper spray alongside a concealed firearm. The speaker argues that while options are good, less-than-lethal tools can sometimes lead to escalated situations and negative legal consequences. A personal anecdote details a self-defense encounter in Birmingham, Alabama, where drawing a Taurus .357 Magnum de-escalated a potentially violent carjacking attempt. The video also features a viewer's EDC, a Walther P99 AS in a Crossbreed holster.

Quick Summary

Carrying less-than-lethal options like pepper spray alongside a concealed firearm can be problematic. While offering more options, they can lead to escalated confrontations and negative legal outcomes. The legal threshold for deadly force is higher than for less-than-lethal force, meaning using mace first could be seen as escalating the situation, potentially harming your defense if deadly force becomes necessary.

Chapters

  1. 00:17Intro: Less Lethal Options with EDC
  2. 01:56The Argument Against Less Lethal Options
  3. 03:01How Mace Can Escalate Situations
  4. 04:02The Risk of Escalation and Legal Issues
  5. 06:04Less Lethal Options in a Car
  6. 07:22Personal Self-Defense Story: Birmingham, AL
  7. 09:10The Incident: Carjacking Attempt
  8. 10:21Carrying a Taurus .357 Magnum
  9. 11:08Drawing the Firearm
  10. 12:06Mistake: Exiting the Vehicle
  11. 13:39The Only Time Weapon Was Pulled
  12. 15:23Viewer EDC: Walther P99 AS
  13. 18:13Closing Thoughts

Frequently Asked Questions

Why might carrying pepper spray or mace with a concealed firearm be a bad idea?

Carrying less-than-lethal options can lead to a false sense of security, potentially causing individuals to engage in confrontations they might otherwise avoid. Furthermore, using mace can escalate a situation, and if deadly force becomes necessary afterward, it might appear to a jury that you escalated the conflict, leading to negative legal consequences.

What is the legal difference between using deadly force and less-than-lethal force?

The legal standard for justifying the use of deadly force is significantly higher than for using less-than-lethal force like pepper spray or a taser. This means that while you might be justified in using mace in a situation, the same situation might not legally justify the use of deadly force, creating a dangerous gap.

Can using pepper spray actually make a self-defense situation worse?

Yes, less-than-lethal options may not always incapacitate an attacker. In some cases, they can escalate the situation, making the attacker more aggressive. This could lead them to perceive a threat to their life, potentially justifying a more violent response and complicating your self-defense claim.

What firearm was used in the Birmingham self-defense incident described?

In the self-defense incident in Birmingham, Alabama, the speaker carried and drew a Taurus .357 Magnum revolver. The mere presentation of the firearm was sufficient to de-escalate the situation and deter the attackers, preventing the need to fire a shot.

Related News

All News →

More Self Defense Videos You Might Like

More from TheYankeeMarshal

View all →