9mm +P vs 10mm: Not Close At All?

Published on July 5, 2024
Duration: 13:03

This video provides an expert-level comparison of 9mm +P and 10mm Auto ballistics, featuring a host with high expertise in terminal ballistics. Through controlled testing on an outdoor range, the video demonstrates penetration capabilities against lumber, sand, concrete, mild steel, and ballistic gel, utilizing a Garmin Xero C1 Pro chronograph for data verification. The 10mm Auto consistently shows superior performance in barrier penetration and energy transfer, though 9mm +P performs better than often expected.

Quick Summary

Expert analysis comparing 9mm +P and 10mm Auto ballistics reveals the 10mm Auto's superior penetration and energy transfer. Tested against barriers like mild steel and ballistic gel, the 10mm consistently outperformed the 9mm +P, though the latter showed respectable performance. Chronograph data confirmed the 10mm's higher muzzle energy (616 ft-lbs) versus the 9mm +P's (456 ft-lbs).

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction and Lumber Test
  2. 02:52Sand Penetration Test
  3. 04:43Concrete Paver Test
  4. 06:42Mild Steel Penetration Test
  5. 10:19Ballistic Gel Penetration Test
  6. 12:17Chronograph Data and Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

How does 10mm Auto compare to 9mm +P in terms of penetration?

The 10mm Auto generally demonstrates superior penetration capabilities compared to 9mm +P. In tests involving 1/8-inch mild steel, the 10mm successfully penetrated while the 9mm +P only dented it. Similarly, in 32 inches of ballistic gel, the 10mm passed through completely, whereas the 9mm +P stopped near the end.

What were the key performance metrics for 9mm +P and 10mm Auto in the video?

The 9mm +P (115 gr FMJ) averaged 1336 fps and 456 ft-lbs of muzzle energy. The 10mm Auto (180 gr FMJ) averaged 1242 fps and 616 ft-lbs of muzzle energy, indicating a significant difference in power and potential.

Did both 9mm +P and 10mm Auto perform well against all barriers?

No, performance varied. Both calibers struggled to penetrate 6 inches of sand. While both shattered a concrete paver, neither reached the target behind it. The 10mm clearly outperformed the 9mm +P in steel and ballistic gel tests.

What equipment was used for the ballistics testing?

The testing utilized CZ P-09 and Glock 20C handguns for firing. A Garmin Xero C1 Pro Chronograph was used to record average velocity and calculate muzzle energy for each shot.

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from Banana Ballistics

View all →