CATI Level 3 Armor vs RUAG SS109

Published on October 16, 2017
Duration: 7:54

This video tests CATI Level 3 steel armor against RUAG SS109 ammunition, comparing its fragmentation containment to previous tests. The armor successfully stopped the SS109 rounds, with minimal fragmentation escaping. The instructor discusses the benefits of steel armor over ceramic, including lack of backface deformation and durability.

Quick Summary

CATI Level 3 steel armor successfully stopped RUAG SS109 ammunition in testing. The plate, even when pre-damaged, showed good fragmentation containment. Steel armor offers benefits like no backface deformation and greater durability compared to ceramic plates.

Chapters

  1. 00:02Introduction to Armor Testing
  2. 00:08RUAG SS109 Ammunition Details
  3. 00:19Testing Against Steel Armor
  4. 00:35Fragmentation Containment Test Setup
  5. 01:04Fragment Detection Methods
  6. 01:40Pre-Conditioned Armor Plate
  7. 02:01Firearm Setup for Test
  8. 02:36Post-Shot Analysis: Plate Edge
  9. 03:23Post-Shot Analysis: Plate Surface
  10. 04:13Observed Fragments
  11. 04:35Backside of the Plate
  12. 04:44Armor Performance Summary
  13. 05:04Fragmentation Containment Effectiveness
  14. 05:47Steel vs. Ceramic Armor Discussion
  15. 06:13Benefits of Steel Armor
  16. 07:07Conclusion and Viewer Engagement

Frequently Asked Questions

How did the CATI Level 3 steel armor perform against RUAG SS109 ammunition?

The CATI Level 3 steel armor successfully stopped the RUAG SS109 rounds. Despite the plate having been previously struck and perforated by M193, it demonstrated good fragmentation containment, with only minimal fragments observed to have escaped.

What are the advantages of steel armor compared to ceramic plates?

Steel armor offers several advantages, including no backface deformation, which means less energy transfer to the body. They are also generally more durable and can be thinner, allowing for less conspicuous wear compared to ceramic plates.

How was fragmentation containment tested on the CATI Level 3 armor?

Fragmentation containment was assessed using masking tape along the plate's edge to detect anything exiting the sides, and water bottles placed next to the plate to see if fragments had enough energy to puncture them.

Is RUAG SS109 ammunition known for its penetrative capabilities?

Yes, the penetrator used in RUAG SS109 ammunition is said to be significantly harder than those found in other SS109 or M855 ammunition, making it a more challenging round for ballistic protection.

Related News

All News →

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from ARFCOM News

View all →