I’m ABSOLUTELY Shocked

This video tests two $30 Temu body armor plates against multiple calibers, from .380 Auto up to .454 Casull. Both the soft panel and hard plate successfully stopped all tested rounds, though the soft armor showed significant damage and delamination, especially from higher-powered rounds. The .454 Casull caused extreme backface deformation on the soft armor but did not penetrate.

This video from Civilian Tactical Science Lab tests the effectiveness of $30 Chinese UHMWPE body armor plates against various calibers, from .22 LR to .454 Casull and rifle rounds like .223. While the armor stops many projectiles, the video highlights significant back face deformation (BFD), posing a serious injury risk. The lack of NIJ certification is a major concern. The reviewer suggests potential non-body applications for the armor, such as protecting bags or vehicles, but strongly advises caution for personal protection due to its low cost and ethical risks.

This short demonstrates a humorous approach to showcasing the protective capabilities of RMA Armament's 'King of Armor' plate. By anthropomorphizing a gummy bear target, the video highlights how body armor can provide a sense of security against potential threats, even in a simulated scenario. The content emphasizes the importance of protective gear in a tactical context.

This video from MuzzleBroke tests the durability of the Maxilla Face Mask by Tardigrade Industries against various firearm calibers, including .500 AutoMax. The mask, rated 3A, demonstrated impressive resilience, with only the most powerful round causing significant damage while maintaining full integrity and preventing backside penetration. The testing highlights the mask's capability to withstand substantial ballistic impact.

This video tests budget body armor purchased from Temu, specifically focusing on Level 4 plates. The creator aims to determine if this affordable body armor is capable of stopping threats and can be a life-saving option. The testing involves shooting the armor, followed by a post-use examination to analyze its performance and structural integrity. The video questions the value proposition of budget-friendly body armor.

This video from Tap Rack Bang, LLC, led by Chief Instructor Ernie Medina, tests the ballistic performance of soft body armor that expired in 2006. Despite its age, the ABA Xtreme Armor vest, manufactured in 2001, demonstrated a surprising ability to stop initial handgun rounds. However, repeated impacts in a tight grouping eventually led to some projectile penetration, highlighting the degradation of materials over time. Medina advises that while expired armor may offer some residual protection, it should not be relied upon for primary duty use.

This comedic skit humorously emphasizes the critical importance of wearing eye protection at the shooting range. It illustrates a handgun malfunction, specifically a stovepipe, and uses a visual gag with a spent casing to drive home the safety message. The creator showcases tactical gear and a Sig Sauer P365 XL, demonstrating firearm handling in a range environment.

This video tests the penetration capabilities of various calibers, from .22 LR to .50 BMG, against a tree. Surprisingly, even the powerful .50 BMG round failed to penetrate the tree completely, demonstrating the significant stopping power of natural barriers against firearms.

This video explores the hypothetical concept of using a human body as a suppressor, simulating the scenario with ballistic gel. A Derya Arms .22 rifle is fired into a ballistic gel head, with the host noting the shot sounded 'dead silent'. The experiment demonstrates the penetration depth of a .22 LR round through the simulated head.

This test evaluates the ballistic protection of a Belgian M1 steel helmet against various calibers. While it stopped birdshot, .22, and .380 Auto rounds, it failed to defeat 9mm and .223 Remington rounds, indicating it is not suitable for protection against common handgun or rifle threats.