I’m ABSOLUTELY Shocked

Published on December 15, 2024
Duration: 2:09

This guide details the testing of a budget-priced body armor plate, evaluating its performance against various calibers from .22 LR up to 6.5 Creedmoor. The Civilian Tactical host, an established tactical gear reviewer, demonstrates the plate's capabilities and limitations, highlighting significant backface deformation even when rounds are stopped. The testing involves multiple firearms including Volquartsen, Zastava, Glock, and CMMG models.

Quick Summary

The $25 Temu body armor plate was tested against various calibers, stopping .22 LR, .38 Special, 9mm, and 5.56 rounds. However, it failed against 6.5 Creedmoor. Significant backface deformation was noted, indicating potential for blunt force trauma even when rounds were stopped.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Intro: $25 Temu Body Armor?
  2. 00:08.22 LR Test (Volquartsen Mamba)
  3. 00:18Handgun Caliber Testing (Zastava, Glock)
  4. 01:01Rifle Caliber Testing (5.56)
  5. 01:476.5 Creedmoor Test & Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

How did the $25 Temu body armor plate perform against different calibers?

The $25 Temu body armor plate successfully stopped .22 LR, .38 Special, 9mm, and 5.56 rounds. However, it failed to stop a 6.5 Creedmoor round, which penetrated the armor.

What is backface deformation and was it an issue with the Temu body armor?

Backface deformation is the bulge on the non-impacted side of armor after a hit. The Temu plate showed significant backface deformation even when stopping rounds, indicating potential for blunt force trauma despite no passthrough.

Which firearms were used to test the $25 Temu body armor plate?

The testing utilized a Volquartsen Arms Mamba for .22 LR, a Zastava revolver for .38 Special, a Glock for 9mm, and CMMG Dissent and CMMG BR3 rifles for 5.56 and 6.5 Creedmoor rounds, respectively.

Is the $25 Temu body armor plate recommended for protection?

While the $25 Temu plate stopped several common rounds and outperformed a pricier $35 version, significant backface deformation suggests it may not meet stringent safety standards for preventing blunt force trauma. Use with caution and awareness of its limitations.

Related News

All News →

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from Civilian Tactical

View all →