Is Carrying a 10mm a Liability?

Published on August 2, 2025
Duration: 11:28

This video debunks the myth that carrying a 10mm Auto is a legal liability, arguing instead that the primary liability stems from inadequate training. The speaker emphasizes that proper ammunition selection is crucial for managing penetration and expansion, and that consistent training with the 10mm is essential to mitigate its significant recoil and ensure effective follow-up shots in self-defense scenarios. The video contrasts the 10mm's origins with its perceived use cases, highlighting its development for human threats rather than solely for bear defense.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was the 10mm Auto originally created?

The 10mm Auto was developed in response to the 1986 Miami Dade shootouts, where 9mm ammunition was perceived as inadequate. The FBI sought a more powerful round for law enforcement and human self-defense, not primarily for bear defense.

Is carrying a 10mm Auto a legal liability in self-defense?

No, carrying a 10mm Auto is generally not a legal liability in a justified self-defense shooting. The speaker argues that there are no documented cases where a conviction resulted solely from the caliber used, and the Harold Fish case was overturned due to systemic corruption, not the firearm caliber.

What is the main liability when carrying a 10mm Auto?

The primary liability when carrying a 10mm Auto is not legal, but rather the need for adequate training. Its significant recoil and larger size require consistent practice to ensure proficiency and effective follow-up shots in a self-defense situation.

How does ammunition selection affect 10mm performance?

Ammunition selection is critical for the 10mm. Hard cast bullets may overpenetrate, while expanding bullets like the 180-grain XTP or Gold Dot are designed to expand and slow down, potentially leading to underpenetration if they overexpand.

Related News

All News →

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from The Gun Dungeon

View all →