LPVOs still suck

Published on April 13, 2026
Duration: 15:58

This video argues that Low Power Variable Optics (LPVOs) are unsuitable for serious fighting carbines, advocating instead for true 1x optics like EOTechs or ACOGs. The speaker, citing extensive training and experience, emphasizes the importance of physical fitness for forming valid opinions on firearm optics. The core arguments revolve around the superior durability, true 1x performance, and better eyebox/eye relief of red dots and fixed magnifiers over LPVOs for combat applications.

Quick Summary

LPVOs are generally considered unsuitable for fighting carbines due to their compromises in true 1x performance, durability, and user experience. Professionals and elite units often opt for true 1x red dot sights like EOTechs or Aimpoints, sometimes with magnifiers, for their reliability and effectiveness in typical combat engagement distances.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: LPVOs Don't Belong on Fighting Carbines
  2. 00:30Why LPVOs Still Suck
  3. 00:39Physical Fitness Prerequisite for Optics Opinions
  4. 01:21The Case Against LPVOs
  5. 03:05Professional Shooters' Optic Choices
  6. 04:09Professional Organizations' Optic Preferences
  7. 04:57Army and Marine Corps Optic Selections
  8. 05:45What Professionals Actually Prefer
  9. 06:06Speaker's Personal Optic Choices
  10. 06:13Speaker's Credentials and Experience
  11. 06:50Speaker's Primary Optic Setup
  12. 07:11Second Favorite Weapon Setup
  13. 07:36Longer Barrel Rifle Optic Setup
  14. 08:02The Trijicon ACOG (RCO)
  15. 08:38Engagement Distances and Optic Capabilities
  16. 09:19Durability of Preferred Optics
  17. 10:01Cost and Affordability of LPVOs
  18. 10:17Critique of Vortex Strike Eagle
  19. 10:30LPVO Cost Breakdown (Throw Lever, Offset Dot)
  20. 10:45Weight and Size Comparison
  21. 11:08Eye Relief Issues with LPVOs
  22. 11:31Durability and Zero Retention Issues
  23. 11:39Mounting Hassles of LPVOs
  24. 12:00Red Dot Mounting Best Practices
  25. 12:36The Importance of Proper Eyebox Under Stress
  26. 13:13Where LPVOs Actually Belong
  27. 13:27The Standard for Fighting Carbines
  28. 13:36Engaging at Longer Distances with Training
  29. 13:50Call to Action: Train and Choose Wisely
  30. 14:21LPVOs Fail at Magnification and 1x
  31. 14:35Advice: Get a Good Dot or an ACOG
  32. 14:42Conclusion and Viewer Engagement
  33. 14:52Support the Channel
  34. 15:17Sign Off

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are LPVOs considered unsuitable for fighting carbines?

LPVOs are criticized for their poor true 1x performance, susceptibility to losing zero, inferior eye relief and eyebox, and added weight and complexity from accessories like throw levers and offset dots. They are seen as a compromise that doesn't excel at either close-quarters or long-range engagements on a primary fighting rifle.

What optics do professionals prefer for combat carbines?

Professionals and elite units often prefer true 1x red dot sights like EOTechs or Aimpoints, sometimes paired with a magnifier. These optics offer durability, a clear sight picture for close engagements, and the flexibility to extend range when needed, aligning with typical combat engagement distances.

What are the main advantages of red dot sights and ACOGs over LPVOs for combat?

Red dots and ACOGs offer true 1x capability, superior durability, lighter weight, and a more forgiving eyebox and eye relief compared to LPVOs. They are designed for rapid target acquisition at close to medium ranges, with magnifiers providing extended capability without the compromises of an LPVO.

What is the speaker's background and why should I trust their opinion on optics?

The speaker is a Marksmanship Master Trainer (MMTC) certified instructor, expert infantryman, and former drill sergeant. Their opinions are based on extensive practical experience, training, and real-world application of firearms and optics in demanding environments.

Related News

All News →

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from Trench Grenade

View all →