O quão mortal é um cartucho de espingarda tipo tenderizer?

This expert-level analysis details a ballistic gel test comparing Wilson Combat's 115gr and 124gr .38 Super +P XTP ammunition fired from a Colt Gold Cup National Match 1911. The test, conducted by Tools&Targets, provides comprehensive data on velocity, penetration, weight retention, and expansion, offering insights into the self-defense capabilities of these loads. The speaker, demonstrating expert authority, breaks down the performance metrics and compares them to advertised specifications.

This video demonstrates the terminal ballistics of 9mm blue tip ammunition, specifically the Havoc Halos from Hickory Flat Boars, when fired into a ballistic gel head. The test, conducted using a Darry Arms DY9 American pistol, shows significant destructive impact and cavity formation. The content serves as a visual aid for understanding ammunition performance on soft targets.

This entry details the testing of the Maverick Drone Systems Anti-Drone Round, a specialized 12-gauge ammunition designed for drone interdiction. The video showcases its unique 5-segment projectile with internal entanglement cords and demonstrates its terminal effects using ballistic gel. The high cost per round is noted, alongside promotional mentions for tactical deals.

This video demonstrates a ballistic gel test of 'chain shot' ammunition, an adaptation of historical pirate cannon shot, loaded into modern shotgun shells. The test evaluates the penetration of fine, medium, and thick chain shot. The instructor, exhibiting experienced authority, concludes that chain shot is impractical and potentially dangerous for modern use, best left to historical reenactments.

This video demonstrates the practical application and terminal effects of the Maverick Drone Systems 20-gauge Anti-Drone Round. Expert analysis from a tactical content creator highlights the round's unique 5-segment projectile design, intended for drone rotor entanglement. Testing with ballistic gel reveals significant damage, proving its lethality even against soft targets, though the high cost is also noted.

This video tests the effectiveness of subsonic 5.56mm and .223 caliber ammunition, which is uncommon for the AR-15 platform. The presenter compares two subsonic rounds (an unknown hollow point and Silent Strike frangible) against a standard supersonic REX bullet by Maker. Key findings include that most subsonic 5.56mm rounds fail to reliably cycle an AR-15 and exhibit significantly reduced energy transfer and wound cavity compared to supersonic counterparts, though penetration can still be substantial.

This video explores the compatibility of a 50 BMG cartridge with a 12 gauge flare gun. The experiment reveals that while the cartridge fits, the flare gun's mechanism cannot ignite the tough 50 BMG primers. However, it successfully fires a standard 12 gauge blank, highlighting the difference in primer hardness. The content is presented from a hobbyist perspective, focusing on experimental curiosity rather than professional instruction.

This video from Tática Civil, featuring an expert instructor, explains the dangers of firing upwards due to projectile drop and terminal velocity. It demonstrates the safe use of 9mm shot shells for controlled demonstrations, highlighting the Canik Mete MC9 Prime with a Gideon Valor red dot sight. The instructor emphasizes crucial firearm safety protocols.

This guide details an experimental test to debunk the myth that a .50 BMG round passing near a target can be lethal. Using a ballistic mannequin, cardboard indicators, and a concrete backstop, the test demonstrates that a near miss from a .50 BMG round does not impart enough shockwave or air pressure to cause fatal injury, though the projectile itself possesses immense kinetic energy as evidenced by its impact on the concrete block. The test was conducted objectively by an individual with high authority, indicated by their empirical testing methods and proper safety protocols.

This video demonstrates a dramatic comparison between the .22 LR and .50 BMG calibers using a ballistic head model. The .50 BMG, when attached to an AR-15 platform via a Raptor upper, shows vastly superior destructive power, completely obliterating the model, while the .22 LR causes only superficial damage. The host's enthusiastic and experimental approach, combined with clear technical explanations, highlights the significant energy difference between these two rounds.