This $60 Rifle Plate STOPS My Entire Arsenal?! (TEMU Body Armor)

This video reviews Guard Dog Armor's new SIC multicurve Level 3+ plates, highlighting their performance against common rifle rounds like M193 and M855, as well as .308 Winchester. The instructor emphasizes their lightweight design (5.3 lbs), multi-curve technology, and excellent spall containment and low backface deformation, making them a high-value option for plate carriers.

This video clarifies the distinction between Level 3 and Level 3+ body armor, emphasizing that '3+' is not an official NIJ standard but indicates enhanced threat protection. Predator Armor's Level 3 plate stops six rounds of 7.62x51mm M80 at 2780 ft/s, while their Level 3+ plate is engineered for higher velocity threats like 5.56mm M193 and 855 rounds exceeding 3000 ft/s, and even 300 Win Mag to a good extent. The video stresses that 'plus' offerings vary significantly between manufacturers.

This video demonstrates a humorous, yet illustrative, test of RMA Armament's 'King of Armor' ballistic plate. A gummy bear, simulated by a bear-shaped water bottle, is shown to feel more secure when presented with the body armor, highlighting its protective capabilities in a lighthearted manner. The demonstration uses readily available items to visualize the concept of ballistic protection.

This video explores a $5 upgrade for body armor using ceramic hexagonal tiles. The presenter tests if this modification can enhance the armor's ability to stop .308 Winchester rounds, building on a previous test where it stopped 5.56x45mm. The upgrade involves attaching ceramic tiles with duct tape to a base armor plate.

This video details the setup of a tactical war belt, focusing on magazine and medical gear placement. The presenter emphasizes the importance of accessible tourniquets and strategic magazine retention for speed reloads while preventing loss during movement.

This guide details a practical test of expired soft body armor, demonstrating its performance against handgun caliber rounds. Chief Instructor Ernie Medina of Tap Rack Bang, LLC, explains that while materials degrade, expired armor may still offer some protection, though it shouldn't be relied upon for primary duty use. The test highlights the importance of understanding ballistic warranties and material limitations.

This video provides an expert-level assessment of BB gun lethality for self-defense, featuring an experienced instructor from 1ShotTV. The test uses a realistic ballistic dummy head to compare a Daisy Red Rider BB gun, an Umarex MP40 CO2 replica, and a Gamo Wildcat Whisper pellet rifle. The findings indicate that BB guns are ineffective for self-defense, while pellet rifles show some potential but lack the stopping power of conventional firearms.

This video provides an expert-level demonstration of the BulletSafe VP3 Level 3A bulletproof vest's capabilities. The host, exhibiting high authority and expertise in ballistics and armor ratings, tests the vest against various calibers up to .44 Magnum and 12-gauge buckshot using a realistic ballistic dummy. The results highlight the vest's effectiveness in stopping rounds while also illustrating the potential for significant blunt force trauma and skeletal damage from high-energy impacts.

This review covers the Crosman DPMS SBR, a full-auto BB gun mimicking an AR-15 SBR. The host, demonstrating experienced authority, details its select-fire capability, dual CO2 power, 25-round capacity, and performance metrics like 430 FPS and 1400 RPM. The review includes practical demonstrations of loading, accuracy testing with minimal recoil, and penetration tests on various targets, concluding it offers a realistic full-auto experience for recreational shooting.

This video from 1ShotTV, featuring an experienced firearms content creator, experimentally tests the viability of a flare gun for self-defense. The tests reveal significant fire hazards when firing into household materials and inconsistent performance against clothing and ballistic targets. The Orion 12-gauge flare gun's single-shot capacity and slow reload time are highlighted as major drawbacks for defensive use. The conclusion strongly advises against using flare guns for self-defense due to these risks and limitations.