7 Day Waiting Period Struck Down

The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has preliminarily enjoined New Mexico's 7-day waiting period for firearm purchases in Ortega v. Gisham. The court ruled that the waiting period infringes upon the Second Amendment by restricting the right to acquire firearms, which is a necessary predicate to keeping and bearing them. This decision emphasizes that such restrictions burden fundamental rights and lack historical justification.

This video details a significant legal victory where the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals struck down New Mexico's 7-day firearm waiting period, ruling it likely violates the Second Amendment. The decision sets precedent for states within the 10th Circuit's jurisdiction and highlights the ongoing legal battles over firearm restrictions. The host emphasizes that delaying a right is akin to denying it, framing waiting periods as an infringement on law-abiding citizens.

The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has struck down New Mexico's 7-day firearm waiting period, ruling it unconstitutional. This decision, based on historical analysis and the Bruen standard, significantly impacts gun control legislation nationwide and reinforces Second Amendment rights. The ruling highlights the lack of historical precedent for such waiting periods in the United States.

This video discusses a significant legal victory for Second Amendment rights in the 10th Circuit Court. The court ruled against New Mexico's 7-day mandatory waiting period for firearm purchases, deeming it an infringement on the right to acquire firearms. The ruling highlights the ongoing legal battles against gun control measures and the role of organizations like the Brady Center and Giffords Law Center in advocating for such laws.

This discussion addresses the unconstitutional firearm carry ban in New Mexico, emphasizing that governors lack the authority to suspend Second Amendment rights. It highlights the importance of citizen action, including contacting representatives and joining advocacy groups, to protect these rights. The conversation also touches on the evolving demographics of gun owners and the need for a diverse coalition to effectively counter gun control efforts.

This video from Guns & Gadgets discusses the NRA's lawsuit against New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham. The NRA argues the Governor's executive order violates the New Mexico state constitution's right to bear arms. The strategy involves seeking a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) and preliminary injunction in state court, providing a fallback if federal cases falter, similar to a successful strategy employed by GOA in Oregon.

This video provides a historical overview of the "assault rifle" designation, tracing its origins from early automatic weapons like the MP18 to the StG44, and its evolution into modern platforms like the AR-15. The speaker, demonstrating high authority, critically examines the political and media manipulation of the term "assault weapon" to confuse the public and advocates for a clear distinction between military-grade select-fire rifles and civilian semi-automatic firearms.

This video details a journalist's attempt to purchase a firearm from Walmart, highlighting the retailer's adherence to federal law and internal policies. The journalist failed a background check due to a mismatch in addresses on her identification, demonstrating the effectiveness of the system. The report also noted Walmart's stricter-than-federal policies, including age restrictions and secure storage.

This video details how the ATF allegedly defied President Trump's executive order to terminate federal Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs. The analysis highlights the ATF's alleged tactic of renaming departments and shifting personnel titles to circumvent the order, citing the case of a Chief Diversity Officer being reclassified as a 'Senior Executive' shortly after the order's effective date. The content suggests a pattern of the ATF changing definitions and obscuring information to maintain programs.

This video details the case of Leyla Pirnie, a Harvard graduate student evicted from her Massachusetts apartment due to her legal gun ownership. It highlights the conflict between a tenant's right to own firearms and roommates' claims of discomfort and lack of 'quiet enjoyment.' The narrative critically examines the landlord's actions, the roommates' demands exceeding state law, and the legal complexities involved in such disputes, emphasizing the importance of understanding tenant rights and firearm regulations.