8th Circuit Court Making Machine Guns Great Again | ARFCOM NEWS

Published on March 13, 2026
Duration: 9:48

This ARFCOM News segment discusses the 8th Circuit Court's decision to overturn the conviction in US v. Brad Wendt, a case involving machine gun sales, potentially impacting future machine gun regulations. It also critically analyzes high-velocity ammunition claims from 110sassactual and Badlands Munitions, highlighting safety concerns regarding extreme pressures. Additionally, the video addresses a proposed Oregon law that could ban hunting and fishing by expanding animal cruelty protections, detailing its potential economic and social consequences.

Quick Summary

The 8th Circuit Court overturned the conviction in US v. Brad Wendt, ruling the statute failed constitutional scrutiny. This decision has implications for machine gun regulations. Critically, claims of 5.56 ammunition reaching 4000+ fps at 120,000 PSI are extremely dangerous, far exceeding SAAMI standards and risking firearm failure.

Chapters

  1. 00:008th Circuit Court Machine Gun Case Overview
  2. 00:10Ammunition Velocity & Pressure Controversy
  3. 00:19Oregon Animal Rights Law & Hunting Ban Threat
  4. 00:24Springfield Armory Channel Support
  5. 00:481776 Insurance for Firearms
  6. 01:08Brad Wendt Case Details & Amicus Brief
  7. 01:34Machine Gun Laws & the Hughes Amendment
  8. 01:498th Circuit Overturns Wendt Conviction
  9. 02:02Palmetto State Armory's Stance on NFA
  10. 02:29Call for Industry Second Amendment Support
  11. 02:49Critique of High-Velocity Ammunition Claims
  12. 03:07Fastest 5.56 Ammunition Claims
  13. 03:11Refuting Extreme Velocity Claims
  14. 03:31Factors Affecting High Velocity
  15. 04:14Barrel Wear from High Velocity Rounds
  16. 04:25SAAMI Pressure Standards vs. Claims
  17. 04:50NAS3 Case Pressure Limits
  18. 05:09Bimetal Casings & High Pressure Safety
  19. 05:30Safety Risks of Extreme Pressure
  20. 06:01Exceeding Safe Pressure Limits
  21. 06:18Viewer Input on AR Setups
  22. 06:29Oregon Hunting/Fishing Ban Petition Update
  23. 06:40Criminalizing Animal Injury in Oregon
  24. 06:50Petition Signatures & Economic Impact
  25. 07:12Consequences of Oregon Animal Law
  26. 07:43ODFW Funding & Tax Burden Concerns
  27. 08:29Economic Impact of Oregon Law
  28. 08:44Ballot Chances & Historical Failures
  29. 08:58Support ARFCOM News Channel

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the significance of the 8th Circuit Court's ruling in the US v. Brad Wendt case?

The 8th Circuit Court overturned Brad Wendt's conviction, ruling that the statute under which he was convicted failed constitutional scrutiny as applied. This decision could impact how machine gun laws are interpreted and enforced, potentially making machine guns more accessible or challenging existing regulations.

What are the safety concerns regarding high-velocity 5.56 ammunition claims?

Claims of 5.56 ammunition reaching over 4000 fps at 120,000 PSI are extremely dangerous. Standard SAAMI pressure limits for 5.56 brass are around 60,000 PSI, and exceeding these can cause catastrophic firearm failure, endangering the shooter and bystanders.

How could the proposed Oregon animal rights law affect hunting and fishing?

The Oregon initiative aims to criminalize harming animals, which would effectively ban hunting, fishing, and pest control. This could lead to significant economic losses for the state and eliminate crucial funding for wildlife management agencies like the ODFW.

What is the difference between claimed ammunition pressures and SAAMI standards?

Manufacturers claiming 120,000 PSI for 5.56 ammunition are far beyond SAAMI (Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute) standards, which set safe pressure limits for brass casings between 58,000-61,000 PSI. Even advanced NAS3 cases have only been tested up to 85,000 PSI.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from ARFCOM News

View all →