An End To The California "Assault Weapon" Ban!!! Miller v. Bonta Update!

This update on the Miller v. Bonta challenge to California's 'assault weapon' ban highlights significant judicial delays by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Despite two rulings by Judge Benitez finding the ban unconstitutional, the 9th Circuit has repeatedly stayed enforcement and introduced new delays, such as requiring briefs on Kitson v. United States. The case is now projected for further action in early 2026, drawing criticism for its protracted timeline.

This video from Guns & Gadgets details the Goldberg v. James lawsuit challenging New York's Times Square gun ban. The lawsuit, supported by the Firearms Policy Coalition, argues that the ban violates the Second Amendment as clarified by the Supreme Court's Bruen decision. The speaker, an expert in Second Amendment news, highlights how New York is attempting to circumvent Bruen by designating public areas like Times Square as 'sensitive locations,' which the Supreme Court cautioned against. The case has broad implications for gun rights nationwide.

Virginia lawmakers are advancing Senate Bill 727, a significant legislative proposal aiming to ban the carrying of certain firearms outside the home. The bill employs broad definitions for 'assault firearms,' encompassing many commonly owned semi-automatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns based on specific features and magazine capacities. This legislation has drawn strong opposition from local law enforcement officials who argue it infringes upon Second Amendment rights and targets law-abiding citizens, potentially leading to widespread non-enforcement due to constitutional concerns.

This video from Guns & Gadgets analyzes New York's proposed Senate Bill S362 and Assembly Bill A3233, which would mandate a ten-day waiting period for all firearm purchases, even after a successful background check. The speaker argues this measure is political cover for 'access control' rather than genuine public safety, citing the FBI's NICS system as instantaneous. The analysis highlights potential conflicts with the Bruen decision and the impact on law-abiding citizens.

This video discusses the legal challenge to New Jersey's ban on Short-Barreled Rifles (SBRs) brought by the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC). The FPC argues that the ban violates the Second Amendment, citing Supreme Court precedents like Bruen and Heller. The case, FPC v. Platkin, is currently in federal court with FPC filing a motion for summary judgment. The video highlights that SBRs are legal under federal law with proper registration and taxes, and that historical precedent does not support banning commonly owned firearms based on features like barrel length.

This video, presented by an expert with extensive knowledge of gun laws and the firearms industry, discusses Colorado's SB26-043 bill, which proposes regulating the sale and transfer of firearm barrels. The presenter highlights the potential implications for manufacturers and consumers, including the requirement for sales to go through federally licensed dealers and the possibility of barrel serialization, which could lead to registration and tracking. The discussion touches upon the unconstitutionality of such measures and the lengthy legal battles required to challenge them.

This video provides an expert analysis of the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in Torcivia v. Suffolk County. The speaker, an authority on Second Amendment litigation, explains how the Second Circuit's ruling allows for warrantless firearm seizures under the 'special needs exception,' despite the Supreme Court's prior decision in Caniglia v. Strom. The denial means this precedent stands, potentially impacting future firearm rights cases.

This expert analysis from Armed Scholar details the Supreme Court's 5-4 emergency order concerning Texas's border dispute with the Biden administration. The ruling allows federal agents to cut concertina wire while the case proceeds, impacting Texas's claim to a constitutional right of self-defense against invasion. The case is remanded for further factual development.

The Supreme Court denied a stay for Missouri's Second Amendment Preservation Act (SAPA), which aimed to prevent state agents from enforcing federal gun laws deemed unconstitutional. The 8-1 decision, with Justice Thomas dissenting, leaves the future of SAPA uncertain, though a statement from Justices Gorsuch and Alito suggests private enforcement mechanisms might still be viable. This ruling has significant implications for state-level attempts to counter federal firearm regulations.

This video details a critical U.S. Supreme Court emergency election order concerning Pennsylvania's handling of provisional ballots. The Supreme Court denied an emergency request to stay a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling that mandated the counting of provisional ballots for voters whose mail-in ballots were deemed invalid. The RNC argued this usurped the state legislature's role and constituted impermissible 'ballot curing.' Justice Alito's opinion noted the limited scope of the lower court's judgment.