AR-15 Ban Passed, Grandfather Clause Added… Now They Want To Do This!

Published on April 14, 2026
Duration: 2:22

This video discusses the legislative strategy behind "assault weapons" bans, specifically highlighting Rhode Island's actions. It details how an initial ban with a grandfather clause can be followed by legislation to remove that clause, making existing ownership a felony. The speaker argues this is a deliberate "playbook" to erode Second Amendment rights.

Quick Summary

A common legislative strategy for "assault weapons" bans involves an initial sale ban with a grandfather clause, followed by a later bill to remove that clause. This makes existing possession a felony, effectively leading to confiscation, as seen in Rhode Island's legislative actions.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: The "Assault Weapons" Ban
  2. 00:17Rhode Island's Initial Ban and Grandfather Clause
  3. 00:30Bill to Remove Grandfather Clause and Criminalize Possession
  4. 00:59Legislative Justification for Removing Grandfather Clause
  5. 01:25Constitutional Rights as a "Typo"
  6. 01:31The "Playbook": Ban Sale, Then Confiscate
  7. 01:41Legal Precedent and State Police Power
  8. 01:56The Compromise and Collection
  9. 02:00The Slippery Slope is Real
  10. 02:14Conclusion: The Grandfather Clause Makes You Next

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the legislative strategy behind "assault weapons" bans?

The strategy often involves an initial ban on sales with a grandfather clause to allow existing ownership. In a subsequent legislative session, the grandfather clause is removed, making possession of previously legal firearms a felony, effectively leading to confiscation.

How did Rhode Island's "assault weapons" ban evolve?

Rhode Island initially banned the sale of "assault weapons" but included a grandfather clause allowing current owners to keep their firearms. A later bill sought to remove this clause, criminalizing possession and making it a felony.

What is the argument for removing a grandfather clause in gun control legislation?

Proponents argue that allowing firearms deemed too dangerous to be sold to remain in circulation undermines the policy's intent and makes enforcement more difficult. They suggest possession should be addressed concurrently with sales bans.

What does the "slippery slope" argument mean in the context of gun control?

The "slippery slope" refers to the concern that initial, seemingly moderate gun control measures (like banning sales) will inevitably lead to more extreme measures (like confiscation of legally owned firearms).

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Colion Noir

View all →