Body Armor Ban Of 2023

Published on February 6, 2023
Duration: 7:53

This video discusses California's Assembly Bill 92, which proposes to ban the sale, purchase, and transfer of body armor for civilians while exempting law enforcement and security personnel. The presenter argues that this ban infringes upon Second Amendment rights, citing historical definitions of 'arms' from Samuel Johnson's and Timothy Cunningham's dictionaries, which included defensive armor. The video suggests that such bans are unconstitutional and that existing laws against using body armor in crimes should be enforced instead of a blanket ban.

Quick Summary

California's Assembly Bill 92 proposes to ban civilian body armor, while exempting law enforcement. The presenter argues this infringes on Second Amendment rights, citing historical definitions of 'arms' from the 18th century that included defensive armor, such as that found in Samuel Johnson's and Timothy Cunningham's dictionaries.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Government Overreach and Body Armor Ban
  2. 00:22USCCA Membership Promotion
  3. 01:14California's Proposed Body Armor Ban (AB 92)
  4. 02:09Is Body Armor Protected by the Second Amendment?
  5. 02:25Historical Definitions of 'Arms'
  6. 03:00Justice Scalia's Interpretation of 'Arms'
  7. 03:24Samuel Johnson's Dictionary Definition
  8. 03:53Timothy Cunningham's Legal Dictionary Definition
  9. 04:44Constitutional Protection of Body Armor
  10. 04:51Public Safety vs. Actual Intent of the Ban
  11. 05:02Existing Laws Against Using Body Armor in Crimes
  12. 05:28Body Armor as a Passive Self-Defense Tool
  13. 06:12Exemptions for Law Enforcement and Security
  14. 06:25Assembly Bill 92 Details and Introduction Date
  15. 06:43Likelihood of the Bill Passing and Legal Challenges
  16. 07:09The Court Process and Potential Delays
  17. 07:20Grandfather Clause and Ownership
  18. 07:38Conclusion: Infringement on Rights

Frequently Asked Questions

What is California Assembly Bill 92?

California Assembly Bill 92 (AB 92) is a proposed law that would ban the sale, purchase, and transfer of body armor to civilians. However, it includes exemptions for active law enforcement officers, security personnel, and military members, allowing them to continue acquiring and using body armor.

Is body armor protected by the Second Amendment?

The presenter argues that body armor is protected by the Second Amendment, citing historical definitions of 'arms' from the 18th century that included defensive armor. These definitions suggest that the founders intended the right to bear arms to encompass items used for defense, not just offensive weapons.

Why is California banning body armor for civilians?

The video suggests that the ban is not primarily for public safety, as it is already illegal to use body armor during the commission of a crime, with significant penalties. The presenter believes the ban is an infringement on citizens' rights to self-defense, removing a passive protective measure.

What are the historical definitions of 'arms' relevant to body armor?

Historical dictionaries from the era the Second Amendment was ratified define 'arms' broadly. Samuel Johnson's 1773 dictionary included 'armor of Defense,' and Timothy Cunningham's 1771 legal dictionary defined 'arms' as 'anything that a man wears for his defense,' directly encompassing body armor.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Copper Jacket TV

View all →