BREAKING: California’s Gun Law Just Got EXPOSED in Court – You Won’t Believe What Happened!

Published on July 27, 2025
Duration: 10:55

This video analyzes the Ninth Circuit's ruling in Baird v. Bont, exposing California's open carry law (Penal Code 26150(b)(2)) as a facade. The law, which theoretically allows open carry in counties under 200,000 residents, has never resulted in a permit being issued in ten years due to a lack of application processes and enforcement. The court found this deliberate non-functionality to be a violation of Second Amendment rights, particularly in the post-Bruen era, where modern justifications are insufficient to uphold restrictions without historical precedent.

Quick Summary

California's open carry law (Penal Code 26150(b)(2)) was exposed in federal court as a non-functional facade. Despite theoretically allowing open carry in small counties, no permits were ever issued due to a lack of application processes and enforcement, leading the Ninth Circuit to rule it a violation of Second Amendment rights.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the Ninth Circuit rule regarding California's open carry law?

The Ninth Circuit ruled that California's open carry law, specifically Penal Code 26150(b)(2), was a facade. The court found that the law, which theoretically allowed open carry in small counties, was deliberately designed to be non-functional, with no application process or permits ever issued, thus violating Second Amendment rights.

Why has California's open carry law in small counties never resulted in permits?

California's open carry law for counties under 200,000 residents has never resulted in permits because there was no established application process, no procedure, and no forms provided. Sheriffs have total discretion with no accountability, and the state never intended for the law to be practically implemented, making it a 'ghost law'.

How did the Bruen decision impact the analysis of California's open carry law?

The Bruen decision shifted the legal standard, requiring gun restrictions to have historical precedent rather than relying on modern justifications like public safety. California's open carry law failed this test because it lacked historical analog and was based on a non-functional design, making it indefensible under the new constitutional scrutiny.

What was the core argument against California's open carry law in Baird v. Bont?

The core argument was that California's open carry law was not a genuine right but a legal fiction designed to avoid accountability. The law offered a theoretical right without any practical means to exercise it, which the Ninth Circuit found to be a deliberate obstruction and a violation of the Second Amendment.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Line45

View all →