CA Mag Ban Ruled Unconstitutional! - The Legal Brief

Published on April 3, 2019
Duration: 9:56

This Legal Brief by Adam Kraut, Esq. details the federal ruling by Judge Benitez that declared California's ban on 'large-capacity magazines' unconstitutional. The ruling applied the Heller Test, finding that common firearm hardware owned by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes is protected. California's arguments based on historical prohibitions and its attempts to apply heightened scrutiny tests were rejected by the court, which found the ban failed under both strict and intermediate scrutiny due to a lack of compelling interest and a failure to be narrowly tailored. The decision also touched upon the Takings Clause, suggesting compensation would be required for compelled disposition of lawfully acquired property.

Quick Summary

U.S. District Court Judge Roger Benitez ruled California's ban on 'large-capacity magazines' (Penal Code Section 32310) unconstitutional, applying the Heller Test. The court found that magazines holding over 10 rounds are commonly owned by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes and that the ban failed strict and intermediate scrutiny.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: CA Magazine Ban Unconstitutional
  2. 00:20Sponsor Ad: SB Tactical Braces
  3. 00:50Judge Benitez Rules CA Ban Unconstitutional
  4. 01:05California Penal Code 32310 Defined
  5. 01:44Court's Analysis: The Heller Test
  6. 02:31CA's Argument: Historical Prohibitions
  7. 03:09Court Rejects Historical Argument
  8. 03:26Complex Scrutiny Tests Explained
  9. 04:17Strict Scrutiny Analysis
  10. 05:45Failure of Strict Scrutiny
  11. 06:23Intermediate Scrutiny Analysis
  12. 07:09The Takings Clause Implications
  13. 07:52Judge Benitez's Concluding Statement
  14. 08:11Current Legal Status & Outlook
  15. 08:54Call to Action & Outro

Frequently Asked Questions

What federal ruling declared California's magazine ban unconstitutional?

U.S. District Court Judge Roger Benitez ruled that California Penal Code Section 32310, which banned 'large-capacity magazines,' is unconstitutional and blocked its enforcement. This decision was based on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens.

What legal test did Judge Benitez apply to California's magazine ban?

Judge Benitez applied the Supreme Court's Heller Test, which examines whether a firearm or accessory is 'in common use' by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes. The court found that magazines holding over 10 rounds met this criterion.

Why did California's magazine ban fail strict scrutiny?

The ban failed strict scrutiny because the state did not demonstrate a compelling government interest to justify the prohibition. Furthermore, the court found the law was not narrowly tailored, describing it as a broad, blanket restriction on the population.

What are the implications of the Takings Clause on magazine bans?

The court indicated that if a state compels the physical disposition of lawfully acquired property, such as magazines over 10 rounds, the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment would require just compensation to be paid to the owner.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from TheGunCollective

View all →