California's Handgun Roster Lawsuit

This video analyzes a Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision that ruled stun guns are not 'arms' under the Second Amendment, contradicting Supreme Court precedent in Kitano v. Massachusetts. The speaker, identified as a constitutional attorney and Supreme Court Bar member, argues the court improperly shifted the burden of proof to plaintiffs and misapplied the Bruen methodology by treating legislative facts as adjudicatory facts. The decision is seen as an attempt to circumvent established Second Amendment jurisprudence and is expected to be challenged at the Supreme Court.

This video discusses a significant legal challenge against New Jersey's ban on Short-Barreled Rifles (SBRs), filed by the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC). The court has administratively terminated FPC's motion for summary judgment, agreeing with New Jersey's argument that the case is not yet in the correct procedural posture for a final ruling. This means the case will proceed to discovery before the constitutional question of the SBR ban's validity under the Second Amendment and the Bruin standard is revisited.

This video discusses a major lawsuit filed by the Firearms Policy Coalition against New York State, challenging the designation of Times Square as a 'sensitive place' and thus a government-mandated gun-free zone. The lawsuit argues that this designation violates the Second Amendment, particularly in light of the Supreme Court's Bruin decision, which affirmed the right to carry handguns for self-defense outside the home. The core argument is that historical 'sensitive places' had government-provided security, a characteristic absent in Times Square, making the ban an unconstitutional restriction on the right to bear arms.

A new federal lawsuit, Goldberg v. James, challenges New York's Times Square gun ban, arguing it violates the Second Amendment. The lawsuit, filed by the Firearms Policy Coalition, contends that Times Square is a public place and that historical tradition does not support such bans. The case could have nationwide implications for 'sensitive place' laws.

This video breaks down a significant federal court ruling that found the federal government's ban on carrying firearms in post offices unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. Host Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney, discusses the scope of the permanent injunction, which benefits current and future members of the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC). The ruling clarifies that members of these organizations can carry firearms in post offices nationwide, with limited exceptions for locations already prohibited for carrying.

This video discusses the Supreme Court case Shenthal v. Raul, which challenges Illinois's ban on carrying firearms on public transportation. The case is presented as crucial for defining 'sensitive places' and preventing government overreach in civilian disarmament, particularly in the wake of the Bruen decision. The Firearms Policy Coalition's argument centers on the historical justification for 'sensitive places' requiring government provision of security.

This guide, presented by an experienced speaker from Copper Jacket TV, outlines crucial steps for firearm owners if the ATF visits their home. It emphasizes the importance of knowing your rights, including the right to remain silent and refuse warrantless searches. The speaker, who is not a lawyer, strongly advises consulting a Second Amendment attorney and highlights the Firearms Policy Coalition's role in defending these rights.

This video from Copper Jacket TV discusses the alarming increase in Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) in New York, driven by a recent executive order from Governor Kathy Hochul. The speaker, an experienced firearms instructor, highlights concerns about due process, as individuals can have their firearms confiscated without prior notice or legal representation. The content serves as a serious warning about the potential expansion of such measures to other states with red flag laws.

This guide covers the fundamental process of zeroing firearms, focusing on both scopes and iron sights. It explains the critical concepts of Point of Aim vs. Point of Impact and the 'follow the hit' principle for iron sights. The video also introduces 'holding' as a method for compensating for bullet drop without mechanical adjustments, offering practical advice for new shooters.

This video, from Copper Jacket TV, demonstrates the perceived absurdity of California's gun laws through the lens of firearm compliance modifications. The speaker, exhibiting an experienced and authoritative tone, highlights how a simple 'fin grip' is presented as a safety measure on firearms like the Desert Tech .308 Bullpup, while questioning the effectiveness and cost of such legislation. The content serves as a critical examination of the state's regulatory approach to firearms.