Creator of Honey Badger talks ATF's Arbitrary Determination on Honey Badger Pistol!

Published on October 7, 2020
Duration: 21:13

This video discusses the ATF's cease and desist letter issued to Q regarding their Honey Badger pistol, declaring it an SBR. The creator argues the ATF's determination is arbitrary, citing the use of SB Tactical braces, which have prior ATF approval on other firearms. The discussion highlights concerns about inconsistent ATF rulings, potential criminalization of millions of firearm owners, and the broader implications for the Second Amendment.

Quick Summary

The ATF issued a cease and desist letter to Q, declaring their Honey Badger pistol an SBR (Short-Barreled Rifle). The creator argues this is arbitrary, as Q uses SB Tactical braces previously approved by the ATF. This ruling could potentially criminalize millions of Americans owning firearms with pistol braces, leading to calls for advocacy and contacting elected officials.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to ATF Controversy
  2. 00:25Q's Location and ATF Audit
  3. 00:46Cease and Desist Letter Received
  4. 01:06Honey Badger Pistol Declared SBR
  5. 01:13Demand for Sugar Weasel and Mini-Fix
  6. 01:24SB Tactical Brace Approvals
  7. 01:30Publicizing the Cease and Desist
  8. 01:57Why Q Was Targeted
  9. 02:14Other Companies Not Targeted
  10. 02:33Arbitrary Criminalization of 4 Million People
  11. 02:48ATF Ruling on Braces Contradicted
  12. 03:01Defining Characteristics of SBR
  13. 03:12Honey Badger Clones
  14. 03:22Technical Evaluation Findings
  15. 03:44SB Tactical Approval Letters
  16. 03:57Length of Pull Measurement Dispute
  17. 04:31Attempting to Work with ATF
  18. 04:56ATF Refuses Written Response
  19. 05:10Verbal Response from ATF
  20. 05:17Ignoring Previous Conversation
  21. 05:30Hoping for DOJ Intervention
  22. 05:36Arbitrary Agency Actions
  23. 05:47NRA's Support and Backing Off
  24. 05:56Reason for NRA Backing Off
  25. 06:15Why ATF Actions Might Offend President
  26. 06:20Delaying Public Announcement
  27. 06:33Working Behind the Scenes
  28. 06:38Need for Clear Parameters
  29. 06:44Submit New Device for Approval
  30. 06:56Cycle That Never Ends
  31. 06:59NRA Afraid of Affecting Election
  32. 07:04NRA Had Q's Letter
  33. 07:10Obligation to Customers
  34. 07:17Waiting to Settle with ATF
  35. 07:25NRA's Promise of Help
  36. 07:44NRA's Last Minute Decision
  37. 07:55Disappointment with NRA
  38. 08:04How Viewers Can Help
  39. 08:21Agency Creating Laws
  40. 08:32DOJ Should Step In
  41. 08:44Contacting DOJ and Representatives
  42. 08:52Overloading NRA with Emails
  43. 08:59Industry Problem, Not Just Q
  44. 09:13Comparison to Sig, Springfield, Ruger
  45. 09:21Stepping Stone to Banning Braces
  46. 09:29Sugar Weasel and Mini-Fix Evaluation
  47. 09:42Sugar Weasel and SBA3 Brace
  48. 09:51Sugar Weasel vs. Other Firearms
  49. 10:04ATF Cannot Evaluate Braces Independently
  50. 10:15Approval is Gun-Specific
  51. 10:36Rifle Barrel Mention in Letter
  52. 10:55Confusion Over Rifling Distinction
  53. 11:09Haphazard ATF Rulings
  54. 11:14Adjusting Measurements to Fit Needs
  55. 11:17No Recourse, DOJ Unchecked
  56. 11:32ATF Should Focus on Criminals
  57. 11:38Shutting Down Legitimate Business
  58. 11:43Fluid Regulations
  59. 11:46Refusal to Respond to Questions
  60. 11:56Not Going After Criminals
  61. 11:59Owner of SB Tactical Interview
  62. 12:15Licensing Braces from SB Tactical
  63. 12:26ATF Cannot Go After SB Tactical Directly
  64. 12:34Going Through Q to Get to SB Tactical
  65. 12:42Information in Description
  66. 12:54Canary in the Coal Mine
  67. 13:01Limiting Rights on Other Firearms
  68. 13:14Bump Stock Ruling as Appetizer
  69. 13:294 Million People Potentially Felons
  70. 13:44Irony of ATF Motto
  71. 14:02Tax Scheme Behind Regulations
  72. 14:11Excise Tax on Pistols
  73. 14:17Declaring Them SBRs
  74. 14:23Getting Excise Tax Back
  75. 14:34Double Taxing the Gun
  76. 14:52Purpose of NFA
  77. 15:14Two Hundred Dollars in the 1930s
  78. 15:46Elite Ownership Status
  79. 16:05Reasons for Compact Rifles/Pistols
  80. 16:15Arbitrary Barrel Length
  81. 16:33ATF Audit Findings
  82. 16:48Could Have Gotten a Phone Call
  83. 16:55Instantly Sending a Letter
  84. 17:00Separating Uppers and Lowers
  85. 17:05Hoping NRA and White House Step Up
  86. 17:18Industry and Gun Owner Problem
  87. 17:26Irony of Keeping Guns
  88. 17:53Asking ATF for Non-Retroactivity
  89. 18:00Parameters for New Brace Design
  90. 18:10Refused to Make it Non-Retroactive
  91. 18:23Regulatory Agency Going Rogue
  92. 18:30Classifications and Rulings
  93. 18:41Joe Biden's Stance on AR-15s
  94. 19:00Son's Fear of Ruby Ridge/Waco
  95. 19:1417-Year-Old's Fear
  96. 19:38Son's Reaction to ATF Letter
  97. 19:54FFL SOT Application
  98. 20:05Appreciation and Best Luck
  99. 20:10Explaining for the Uninitiated
  100. 20:23Culture War Against Second Amendment
  101. 20:30How to Spread the Message
  102. 20:46Purchase Links

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the ATF issue a cease and desist letter to Q regarding the Honey Badger pistol?

The ATF issued a cease and desist letter to Q, declaring their Honey Badger pistol an SBR (Short-Barreled Rifle). This action demands that Q immediately stop production of the firearm, citing concerns over its classification and the use of pistol braces.

What is the main argument against the ATF's classification of the Honey Badger pistol as an SBR?

The primary argument is that the ATF's determination is arbitrary. Q utilizes SB Tactical braces, which have previously received approval letters from the ATF for use on other firearms, making the selective targeting of the Honey Badger pistol appear inconsistent and unfair.

How might the ATF's ruling on the Honey Badger pistol affect other firearm owners?

The ATF's ruling could potentially criminalize millions of Americans who own firearms equipped with pistol braces. The arbitrary nature of the decision raises concerns that similar actions could be taken against other firearms, impacting a broad segment of the gun-owning population.

What actions can individuals take to address the ATF's ruling on pistol braces?

Individuals can contact the Department of Justice (DOJ) and their elected representatives, including Congressmen and Senators, to express their concerns. Overloading the NRA with emails urging them to take action is also suggested as a way to influence the situation.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Colion Noir

View all →