Does RareBreed Have a Government Sanctioned Monopoly?

Published on June 7, 2026
Duration: 11:53

This video discusses the legal implications of the settlement between Rare Breed triggers and the Department of Justice, focusing on whether it grants a government-sanctioned monopoly. It analyzes statements made by ATF Director Cicada regarding the classification of forced reset triggers and other auto-conversion devices, highlighting the technical nuances involved in ATF's regulatory approach. The content emphasizes that the settlement is specific to Rare Breed's product and not a blanket approval for all rapid-fire trigger mechanisms.

Quick Summary

The settlement between Rare Breed triggers and the DOJ is specific to their FR-15 product and requires patent enforcement, not a government-sanctioned monopoly. ATF Director Cicada clarified that the legal definition of a machine gun hinges on the single function of the trigger, not just rate of fire, and the ATF is technically evaluating other rapid-fire devices on a case-by-case basis.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction & GunCon
  2. 00:18Rare Breed Settlement Overview
  3. 00:52Government Sanctioned Monopoly Question
  4. 01:37ATF Director Cicada's Congressional Testimony
  5. 01:46Sponsor: Right to Bear
  6. 02:26ATF Director Cicada's Testimony Clip
  7. 03:47Rob Leader's Objection to Settlement
  8. 04:01Technical Nuances of Trigger Operation
  9. 04:32Rate of Fire vs. Statute Definition
  10. 04:51Instructor's Analysis of Cicada's Response
  11. 05:16Beekeeping Interlude
  12. 05:40Misconception on Trigger Pack Application
  13. 05:57ATF Examining Devices Technically
  14. 06:20Settlement Applied to Classification
  15. 06:42Handgun Settlement Restrictions
  16. 06:51Viewer Opinions & Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the Rare Breed settlement with the DOJ grant them a government-sanctioned monopoly on forced reset triggers?

No, the settlement is specific to Rare Breed's FR-15 product and requires them to enforce their patents. It does not grant a broad monopoly or legalize all forced reset triggers. ATF Director Cicada clarified that the settlement is a technical agreement for a specific device, not an industry-wide ruling.

How does the ATF define a machine gun according to Director Cicada's testimony?

ATF Director Cicada stated that the legal definition of a machine gun, according to the statute, is based on the single function of the trigger, not solely on the rate of fire. This distinction is crucial in differentiating legal trigger mechanisms from illegal automatic conversion devices.

What is the ATF's current approach to regulating rapid-fire trigger devices after the Rare Breed settlement?

The ATF is treating the regulation of rapid-fire trigger devices as a technical and nuanced matter. They are examining individual devices to determine if they fall under the Rare Breed settlement or other existing regulations, rather than applying a blanket rule.

Did the ATF's Chief Counsel object to the Rare Breed settlement?

Yes, the Washington Post reported that ATF Chief Counsel Rob Leader objected to the settlement, reportedly believing the devices were dangerous and should retain their machine gun classification. This indicates internal disagreement within the ATF regarding the settlement's implications.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from The VSO Gun Channel

View all →