FORMER KIMBER VP SUPPORTS GUN CONTROL!!!

Published on January 27, 2021
Duration: 9:55

This video discusses the stance of a former Kimber VP who opposes constitutional carry and supports gun control measures. The speaker argues that 'common sense' is a misused term in gun control debates and that requiring permits creates barriers for law-abiding citizens while failing to deter criminals. The video emphasizes that being pro-gun should also mean being pro-individual responsibility, and that support for the Second Amendment does not automatically equate to support for all gun owners or companies.

Quick Summary

The video argues that constitutional carry is not inherently dangerous and that requiring permits creates unnecessary barriers for law-abiding citizens, while criminals will ignore such laws anyway. The speaker contends that 'common sense' is often used to justify gun control without solid reasoning, serving as a scapegoat for a lack of substantive arguments.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Kimber VP Supports Gun Control
  2. 00:44Pro-Gun and Pro-Responsibility
  3. 01:22Former VP's Industry Experience
  4. 01:49Bill Ruger's Stance
  5. 01:54Critique of HB 102
  6. 02:14Consequences of Permitless Carry
  7. 03:03'I Own Guns, But...' Argument
  8. 03:38Constitutional Carry and Violence
  9. 04:16Obsession with Government Permits
  10. 04:46Barriers to Carrying Firearms
  11. 05:22Criminals vs. Law-Abiding Citizens
  12. 06:18Constitutional Carry and Safety
  13. 06:25Fudds in the Firearms Industry
  14. 06:44Viewer Opinions Requested
  15. 07:46Twitch Stream Announcement

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main argument against constitutional carry presented in the video?

The video argues that constitutional carry is not inherently dangerous and that requiring permits creates unnecessary barriers for law-abiding citizens, while criminals will ignore such laws anyway. The speaker contends that 'common sense' is often used to justify gun control without solid reasoning.

Why does the video criticize the use of the term 'common sense' in gun control debates?

The speaker suggests that 'common sense' is used as a scapegoat or a cop-out in gun control discussions, avoiding actual arguments and presenting opinions as rational necessities. It's seen as a way to pressure agreement rather than engage in logical debate.

What is the speaker's view on the responsibility of gun owners?

The speaker emphasizes that being pro-gun also means being pro-responsibility. This includes knowing how to operate, maintain, and safely handle firearms, and understanding that individual responsibility for one's actions is paramount, even when exercising constitutional rights.

How does the video address the credibility of individuals speaking out against gun rights?

The video points out that a former VP of a major firearms company speaking against constitutional carry can lend significant, potentially misleading, credibility to anti-gun rights arguments. It highlights that such individuals may not represent the broader gun-owning community.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Reno May

View all →