Founders DID NOT Give 2A Rights to 18-20 Year Olds! (They Were "Infants")

Published on April 15, 2025
Duration: 12:03

This video explores the legal argument that the Second Amendment does not inherently grant firearm purchase rights to 18-20 year olds, as the founders considered individuals under 21 to be legal infants. The speaker argues that modern society's redefinition of adulthood at 18 creates a contradiction if these rights are denied, highlighting the hypocrisy of selectively applying historical legal standards. The core contention is that if 18-year-olds are recognized as adults for other societal functions, they should also possess full constitutional rights, including firearm ownership.

Quick Summary

The founders considered individuals under 21 to be legal infants, not adults, and thus they did not possess full adult rights like purchasing firearms. Modern legal arguments against 18-20 year olds having gun rights are based on this historical interpretation, despite society now recognizing 18-year-olds as adults for most purposes.

Chapters

  1. 00:14Introduction: Gun Rights for 18-20 Year Olds
  2. 00:52Founders' View: Age of Majority at 21
  3. 01:33Modern Changes: Voting at 18
  4. 02:01Legal Argument: No Constitutional Right to Buy Guns
  5. 02:32English Law & Legal Infancy Under 21
  6. 03:01Historical Use of Guns by Minors
  7. 04:03Contradiction: Modern Adulthood vs. Historical Rights
  8. 04:36Historical Injustices: Race, Gender, and Rights
  9. 05:53Modern Rights Granted at 18
  10. 06:40Speaker's Stance: Founders Were Right on Age
  11. 07:27Erroneous Precedent: Denying Rights Based on History
  12. 08:35Accepting Modern Adulthood or Reverting Rights
  13. 09:11Personal View: Adulthood at 25
  14. 10:19Critique of Conservative Judge's Ruling

Frequently Asked Questions

Did the Founding Fathers consider 18-20 year olds to be adults with full rights?

No, according to historical legal interpretations discussed, the founders considered individuals under 21 to be legal infants. This meant they lacked full adult rights, including the right to enter contracts or purchase firearms independently.

What is the legal basis for denying 18-20 year olds handgun purchase rights?

The argument stems from the founders' era where the age of majority was 21. Courts are now using this historical precedent to argue that the Constitution, as originally written, did not grant firearm purchase rights to those under 21.

How does modern society's definition of adulthood conflict with historical legal interpretations regarding gun rights?

Modern society generally recognizes 18-year-olds as adults, granting them rights like voting and entering contracts. This creates a contradiction if they are denied the right to purchase firearms based on a historical definition of adulthood that society has since abandoned.

Can individuals under 21 legally use firearms historically?

Historically, individuals under 21 could use firearms for military service or in the militia. They could also own firearms if their father permitted, but they did not possess the independent right to purchase them as adults did.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from TheYankeeMarshal

View all →