FPC lawsuit win - 1in30 restrictions- Nguyen v BONTA

Published on August 16, 2024
Duration: 1:01

The Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) has secured a legal victory in the Nguyen v. BONTA lawsuit, with a three-judge panel at the 9th Circuit vacating California's '1 in 30' firearm rationing law. This ruling temporarily lifts the restriction that limited individuals to purchasing one firearm every 30 days. While an appeal is expected, as of the video's recording, individuals could purchase multiple firearms and undergo multiple background checks within a 30-day period.

Quick Summary

The Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) won a lawsuit, Nguyen v. BONTA, leading to the temporary vacation of California's '1 in 30' firearm rationing law. This ruling allows individuals to purchase multiple firearms and undergo multiple background checks within a 30-day period, though an appeal is expected.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Update on 1 in 30 Firearm Rationing Law
  2. 00:05Nguyen v BONTA Lawsuit Overview
  3. 00:10Challenging the 1 in 30 Background Check Restriction
  4. 00:17COE and FF3 Workarounds
  5. 00:26Firearms Policy Coalition Lawsuit Win
  6. 00:319th Circuit Vacates the Law
  7. 00:37Current Status: Purchase as Many Firearms as Desired
  8. 00:43Uncertainty in Processing More Than One in 30 Days
  9. 00:52Consult Local Gun Stores for System Workarounds

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the '1 in 30' firearm law in California?

The '1 in 30' law in California previously restricted individuals to purchasing only one firearm every 30 days. This meant that after buying a gun, you had to wait 30 days before you could legally purchase another one, impacting regular firearm acquisition.

What was the outcome of the Nguyen v. BONTA lawsuit?

In the Nguyen v. BONTA lawsuit, the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) achieved a victory. A three-judge panel at the 9th Circuit Court vacated the '1 in 30' firearm rationing law, temporarily suspending its enforcement and allowing for more frequent firearm purchases.

Can I buy multiple firearms in California now after the Nguyen v. BONTA ruling?

Following the FPC's lawsuit win in Nguyen v. BONTA, the '1 in 30' restriction was temporarily vacated. As of the video's recording, you could purchase as many firearms and do as many background checks as you want in a 30-day period, though confirming processing with local dealers is advised.

Is the '1 in 30' firearm law permanently gone in California?

No, the '1 in 30' firearm law is not permanently gone. The ruling by the 9th Circuit Court was a vacation of the law, and it is widely expected that this decision will be appealed. Therefore, the legal status of the restriction could change in the future.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Reno May

View all →