Governor floats "grandfathered" AR CONFISCATION… Get’s SMOKED even by DEMS and gun control groups...

Published on December 19, 2022
Duration: 7:47

Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont's suggestion to "grandfather" AR-15 confiscation faced significant backlash, even from Democrats and gun control advocacy groups. The proposal, framed as a public safety measure to close a perceived loophole, was deemed 'too much too soon' by many. This event highlights the complexities and divisions within the gun control debate, particularly concerning existing firearm ownership.

Quick Summary

Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont proposed confiscating AR-15s, citing a public safety loophole. This suggestion faced strong opposition from Democrats and gun control groups, who deemed it 'too much too soon.' The debate centered on removing grandfathered AR-15s, a more aggressive stance than typical gun control measures.

Chapters

  1. 00:14CT Governor's AR Confiscation Suggestion
  2. 00:51Smith & Bradley Watch Sponsorship
  3. 00:59Discovery Quartz Field Watch Details
  4. 01:24Ned Lamont's AR Confiscation Proposition
  5. 01:45Lamont Finds Little Support
  6. 02:33Connecticut Changing Course Suggestion
  7. 02:45Gun Control Bills vs. Confiscation
  8. 03:11Grandfather Clause Intention
  9. 03:29Sandy Hook Anniversary Context
  10. 03:55Gun Control Group Disagreement
  11. 04:16Lamont's 'Loophole' Quote
  12. 04:22Taking Grandfathered Guns
  13. 05:12Lamont Draws No Support on Confiscation
  14. 05:29Incremental Gun Control Focus
  15. 06:30Roadblocks for Lamont's Proposal
  16. 06:45Incrementalism: Death by a Thousand Cuts
  17. 07:09Control and Intensity Amount

Frequently Asked Questions

What was Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont's controversial proposal regarding AR-15s?

Governor Ned Lamont suggested confiscating all AR-15s in Connecticut, claiming they represented a loophole in public safety. He proposed changing course on grandfathering these weapons, which were banned after the Sandy Hook tragedy.

Did other Democrats or gun control groups support Lamont's AR confiscation idea?

No, Lamont's proposal faced significant opposition. Even Democrats and gun control advocacy groups considered it 'too much too soon' and 'a bridge too far,' indicating a lack of broad support for outright confiscation.

What is the significance of the 'grandfather clause' in the context of AR-15 bans?

A grandfather clause typically allows individuals to keep firearms legally owned before a ban was enacted. Lamont's proposal aimed to remove these grandfathered AR-15s, effectively confiscating them, which is a more aggressive stance than simply preventing future purchases.

Why did Governor Lamont suggest AR-15 confiscation was necessary for public safety?

Governor Lamont quoted, 'I think it's a loophole that makes our society here in Connecticut a little less safe.' He viewed AR-15s as a public safety hazard and believed their continued ownership, even if grandfathered, undermined safety efforts.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Langley Outdoors Academy

View all →