Historic Win: Court Strikes Down Waiting Periods

Published on December 23, 2025
Duration: 6:20

This video from Copper Jacket TV discusses a significant legal victory where the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals struck down New Mexico's 7-day firearm waiting period, ruling it likely violates the Second Amendment. The host, Will, explains the legal philosophy behind the ruling, emphasizing that delayed rights are denied rights and that waiting periods unfairly target law-abiding citizens. The decision sets a precedent for states within the 10th Circuit's jurisdiction and highlights a potential circuit split that could lead to Supreme Court review.

Quick Summary

The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that New Mexico's 7-day firearm waiting period likely violates the Second Amendment, establishing precedent for states like Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Utah. This ruling is based on the principle that 'a right delayed is a right denied,' arguing that such delays infringe upon constitutional rights.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Historic Win Against Firearm Waiting Periods
  2. 01:54Legal Philosophy: Right Delayed is Right Denied
  3. 02:2410th Circuit Ruling on New Mexico Waiting Period
  4. 04:12Injunction Issued and Precedent Set
  5. 05:19Potential Circuit Split and Supreme Court Review

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the outcome of the 10th Circuit Court's ruling on firearm waiting periods?

The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that New Mexico's 7-day firearm waiting period likely violates the Second Amendment. This decision reversed a lower court's stance and issued an injunction against the law, establishing precedent for other states in the circuit.

What legal principle is used to argue against firearm waiting periods?

The principle 'a right delayed is a right denied' is central to the argument against firearm waiting periods. This perspective suggests that imposing delays on exercising a constitutional right, like the Second Amendment, effectively infringes upon that right.

Which states are affected by the 10th Circuit's ruling on waiting periods?

The 10th Circuit's ruling sets binding precedent for states under its jurisdiction. These states include Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Utah, impacting how firearm waiting period laws are viewed and enforced within these jurisdictions.

Could this ruling lead to a Supreme Court case on firearm waiting periods?

Yes, a potential circuit split, particularly if the 9th Circuit rules differently on California's waiting period, could lead the Supreme Court to take up the issue. This would allow the nation's highest court to provide a definitive ruling on the constitutionality of firearm waiting periods nationwide.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Copper Jacket TV

View all →