Is California trying to push FFL's out of business?
This video discusses the ongoing litigation challenging California's mandatory surveillance laws for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs). The CRPA is pursuing a lawsuit, Richard's v. Nome, arguing these laws impose significant costs and privacy intrusions on FFLs, particularly home-based businesses and those operating at gun shows. The discussion highlights the legal strategy, including the removal of equal protection and Second Amendment claims, and the focus on First Amendment (chilling effect), takings claims, and Fourth Amendment (unwarranted search) arguments.











