Novel from SEAL Jack Carr; Judge - AR-15 Same As Machine Gun; SIG Report: Gun Talk Radio | 7.28.19 C

Published on July 29, 2019
Duration: 43:57

A federal judge in California upheld the state's ban on many semi-automatic firearms, ruling that AR-15s are 'indistinguishable' from M16s and possess military-grade hardware. The judge cited anti-gun groups' briefs and stated these rifles are 'virtually indistinguishable in practical effect from machine guns' due to their rate of fire. This ruling notably ignored research indicating millions of modern sporting rifles are in common use for lawful purposes.

Quick Summary

A California federal judge upheld the state's ban on semi-automatic firearms, ruling AR-15s are 'indistinguishable' from M16s and possess military-grade hardware. Citing anti-gun groups, the judge claimed their rate of fire makes them virtually indistinguishable from machine guns, while ignoring data on common use.

Chapters

  1. 12:36Judge Upholds California's Ban on Semi-Automatic Firearms
  2. 12:55AR-15s Deemed 'Indistinguishable' from M16s by Federal Judge
  3. 13:24Judge Cites Anti-Gun Groups and Military-Grade Hardware Claims
  4. 13:58Rate of Fire Argument: Semi-Autos vs. Machine Guns
  5. 14:47Ignoring Data on Common Use of Modern Sporting Rifles

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the main argument in the California judge's ruling on semi-automatic firearms?

The judge ruled that AR-15 style semi-automatic rifles are 'indistinguishable' from M16s. This comparison was used to justify the ban, classifying these firearms as military-grade hardware with a rate of fire virtually equivalent to machine guns.

Which organizations' briefs did the California judge cite in the semi-automatic firearm ban case?

The judge extensively cited briefs from anti-gun groups, including the Brady Center, Everytown, and Giffords. These groups provided arguments that influenced the court's decision regarding the classification of semi-automatic rifles.

Did the judge consider data on the common use of AR-15 style rifles in her ruling?

No, the judge's order did not reference research from the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) which shows millions of modern sporting rifles are in common use for lawful purposes, such as self-defense, contradicting the basis for banning them as 'dangerous and unusual'.

What is the judge's claim about the rate of fire for semi-automatic rifles?

The judge stated that semi-automatic rifles are capable of a rate of fire between 300 to 500 rounds per minute. She concluded this makes them 'virtually indistinguishable in practical effect from machine guns'.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Gun Talk Media

View all →