SCOTUS Considering a Case on Whether the Government Can Prohibit Carrying Outside the Home

Published on December 28, 2019
Duration: 6:55

This video from Guns & Gadgets discusses a critical Supreme Court case, Malpasso v. Pallozzi, concerning the right to carry handguns outside the home. Expertly presented by Jared, the content details how 21 State Attorneys General filed an Amicus Brief to challenge Maryland's restrictive concealed carry law, which requires a "good and substantial reason." The discussion highlights the distinction between 'shall-issue' and 'may-issue' states and emphasizes the potential nationwide impact of a favorable ruling on Second Amendment rights.

Quick Summary

The Supreme Court is considering the Malpasso v. Pallozzi case, which questions whether the Second Amendment prohibits governments from banning law-abiding citizens from carrying handguns outside their homes for self-defense. This case could expand upon the Heller decision and impact restrictive 'may-issue' carry laws in various states.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction and Channel Overview
  2. 00:34States Petition SCOTUS on Carry Law
  3. 00:58Amicus Brief Authors and States
  4. 01:30SCOTUS Question and Heller Decision
  5. 02:05Shall-Issue vs. Restrictive States
  6. 03:31Constitutional Rights Take Precedence
  7. 03:49Malpasso v. Pallozzi Case Background
  8. 04:55New York SCOTUS Case Comparison
  9. 05:27Significance of Maryland Case
  10. 06:05Future Outlook and Farewell

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main legal issue in the Malpasso v. Pallozzi Supreme Court case?

The core issue is whether the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution allows the government to prohibit law-abiding citizens from carrying handguns outside their homes for the purpose of self-defense, potentially expanding upon the rights established in the Heller decision.

How do 'shall-issue' and 'may-issue' states differ regarding concealed carry permits?

In 'shall-issue' states, authorities must issue a permit to any qualified applicant meeting objective criteria. Conversely, 'may-issue' states grant authorities discretion to deny permits, often requiring applicants to demonstrate a specific need or "good and substantial reason."

Who filed an Amicus Brief in the Malpasso v. Pallozzi case, and what was their goal?

Twenty-one State Attorneys General, led by West Virginia's Patrick Morrisey, filed an Amicus Brief. Their objective was to urge the Supreme Court to strike down Maryland's restrictive concealed carry law, arguing it infringes upon Second Amendment rights.

Why is the Malpasso v. Pallozzi case considered significant for gun rights advocates?

This case is significant because a favorable ruling could invalidate restrictive 'may-issue' concealed carry laws in states like Maryland and Massachusetts, thereby affirming the constitutional right to carry firearms for self-defense outside the home nationwide.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News

View all →