Should FELONS Be Given Their Rights Back??

Published on January 25, 2021
Duration: 10:56

Paul Harrell argues that laws restricting firearm ownership for felons, particularly after they have served their time, are fundamentally flawed. He contends that the premise of 'allowing' felons to own firearms is presumptuous, as individuals intent on harm will not adhere to such laws. Harrell emphasizes that good-faith arguments for gun control often rely on narratives rather than statistics, pointing out that common items like hammers cause more harm than certain firearms. He advocates for the repeal of all firearm-related laws, asserting that they primarily disarm law-abiding citizens while failing to deter criminals.

Quick Summary

Paul Harrell argues that firearm restrictions for felons are flawed, especially after they've served their time. He believes criminals disregard laws, and restrictions disarm law-abiding citizens. Citing statistics, he suggests common items cause more harm than firearms, advocating for the repeal of all gun laws.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Felon Gun Rights Debate
  2. 00:30Challenging the Status Quo on Gun Laws
  3. 01:30Addressing Common Objections
  4. 02:28Personal Evolution on Felon Rights
  5. 03:03The Concept of 'Debt to Society'
  6. 03:54Statistics vs. Narratives in Gun Debate
  7. 05:26The Presumptuous Nature of the Question
  8. 06:43Hammer Deaths vs. Firearm Deaths
  9. 07:26Blunt Force vs. Firearms Statistics
  10. 08:33Why Repeal All Gun Laws?
  11. 08:54Felons Owning Cars, Hammers, Knives
  12. 09:25The Real Reason for Gun Control Narratives
  13. 10:04Murder is Already Illegal
  14. 10:28Repeal All 20,000 Gun Laws

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Paul Harrell's main argument regarding felons and firearm ownership?

Paul Harrell argues that once felons have paid their debt to society, they should not be permanently stripped of their rights, including firearm ownership. He believes that criminals do not follow laws anyway, and restrictions primarily disarm law-abiding citizens.

How does Paul Harrell address the argument that violent felons pose a significant risk?

Harrell suggests the question itself is presumptuous, as those intent on harm will not adhere to laws. He also points to statistics indicating that common items like hammers cause more deaths than certain firearms, questioning the focus on specific gun types.

What is Paul Harrell's stance on gun control statistics versus narratives?

Harrell contends that gun control debates often rely on narratives rather than objective statistics. He believes statistics show that firearms are not the primary cause of violence and that focusing on them distracts from more prevalent issues.

What does Paul Harrell propose regarding existing firearm laws?

Paul Harrell advocates for the complete repeal of all firearm-related laws, estimating there are around 20,000 such laws. He believes these laws are ineffective and only serve to disarm law-abiding citizens.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Paul Harrell

View all →