The Right to Keep and Bear Arms Preceded the Second Amendment

Published on May 8, 2012
Duration: 5:52

This video discusses the historical and philosophical origins of the right to keep and bear arms, arguing that it predates the Second Amendment and the United States itself, stemming from a natural right endowed by God for self-defense. It contrasts this with modern interpretations of rights as entitlements provided by the state, such as free healthcare and housing, and emphasizes the importance of educating future generations on the distinction between natural rights and government-granted rights.

Quick Summary

The right to keep and bear arms is argued to be a natural right, predating the Second Amendment and the United States. This right, endowed by God for self-defense, is contrasted with modern 'positive rights' like free healthcare, which are seen as entitlements provided by the state, potentially undermining fundamental freedoms.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction of Topic
  2. 00:10Article on Right to Bear Arms
  3. 00:25Anti-Gun Movement Tactics
  4. 01:00Natural Right to Bear Arms
  5. 01:47Modern Rights vs. Original Rights
  6. 02:32Positive vs. Negative Rights
  7. 03:20Ratification Debates
  8. 04:24Educating the Next Generation
  9. 04:45Human Rights vs. Natural Rights
  10. 05:39Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

When did the right to keep and bear arms originate?

The argument presented is that the right to keep and bear arms predates the Second Amendment and even the United States itself. It is posited as a natural right endowed by God at creation for the defense of life, which is considered the most valuable property.

What is the difference between natural rights and positive rights?

Natural rights are considered inherent to individuals, not granted by any government, such as the right to self-defense. Positive rights, conversely, are entitlements that require action from the state or others to be fulfilled, like the right to free healthcare or housing.

What was the debate surrounding the Second Amendment's ratification?

During the ratification of the Second Amendment, the debate was not over whether the right to keep and bear arms existed, but rather how best to protect it. Some founders believed common sense was sufficient, while others, like the Anti-Federalists, insisted on explicit constitutional protection to prevent future government infringement.

Why is it important to distinguish between human rights and natural rights?

Distinguishing between human rights (often interpreted as state-provided entitlements) and natural rights (inherent freedoms) is crucial. The educational system's focus on 'human rights' can lead individuals to believe their rights are granted by the state, undermining the concept of inherent freedoms like gun ownership.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from NRA

View all →