Tom Gresham's GUNTALK - 2.15.15 Part A

Published on February 19, 2015
Duration: 44:45

This episode features a discussion with Alan Gottlieb of the Second Amendment Foundation and the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms regarding a significant court victory. The ruling struck down provisions of the 1968 Gun Control Act that prohibited the interstate purchase of handguns, establishing a strict scrutiny standard for such regulations. The discussion highlights the strategic importance of building case law and the ongoing legal battles to protect Second Amendment rights.

Quick Summary

A federal court has ruled that provisions of the 1968 Gun Control Act prohibiting the interstate purchase of handguns are unconstitutional. The ruling applied strict scrutiny, requiring the government to demonstrate a compelling interest, which it failed to do. This victory is part of a broader strategy to build legal precedent for Second Amendment rights.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Intro & Show Preview
  2. 01:01Topics: Competition Shooting, 2nd Amendment Attorney
  3. 02:17Recoil Discussion: .44 Magnum
  4. 02:20National Reciprocity Bill Mentioned
  5. 03:11Armscor & Internet Anniversary
  6. 03:41FirstPerson Defender Series Promo
  7. 04:10Liberty Safes Promo
  8. 04:41Brownells 75th Anniversary
  9. 05:23Major Court Case Discussion Begins
  10. 05:30Guest: Alan Gottlieb (SAF)
  11. 06:36The Case: 1968 Gun Control Act Provisions
  12. 07:07Current Law vs. New Ruling Explained
  13. 08:05Key Ruling: Strict Scrutiny Standard
  14. 09:02Anticipated Appeal by Government
  15. 09:37Eric Holder's Regrets on Gun Control
  16. 10:06Impact of Ruling on Gun Stores
  17. 11:00Litigation Strategy: Stepping Stones
  18. 11:32Key Precedents: Heller, McDonald, Moore
  19. 12:39Winning Gun Rights One Lawsuit at a Time
  20. 14:14SAF vs. Citizens Committee Roles
  21. 15:29Discussion on Violence Policy Center (VPC)
  22. 17:41VPC & Assault Weapon Ban History
  23. 18:46Litigation Progress & Headway
  24. 19:38Current Litigation Portfolio & Budget
  25. 19:49Cost of Lawsuits
  26. 21:01Call to Action: Support SAF/CCRKBA
  27. 21:40Ruling Summary: Interstate Handgun Ban
  28. 22:10Next Segment: Wing Shooting Instruction
  29. 23:03Springfield Armory Giveaway
  30. 23:40FirstPerson Defender Season 2 on YouTube
  31. 23:50Wing Shooting with Leon Messers
  32. 24:18Guest: Leon Messers (Shoot Where You Look)
  33. 24:44Origin of 'Shoot Where You Look' Method
  34. 26:05Transition from BB Guns to Shotguns
  35. 27:33Developing a Custom Training BB Gun
  36. 28:05Dove Shoot in Argentina
  37. 29:16Preparation for High-Volume Shooting
  38. 30:52Importance of Focus on One Bird
  39. 32:03Shoot Where You Look Website
  40. 32:33Call-in Lines Open
  41. 32:56Crossbreed Holsters Bedside Backup
  42. 33:24Federal Premium Guard Dog Ammo
  43. 33:51Top Gun Supply Promo
  44. 34:37Twitter/Tech Issues
  45. 35:48Listener Questions: Self-Defense, BBQ Gun
  46. 36:33Gun Talk 20th Anniversary Edition: Sig P220 GT20
  47. 37:14DYS Guns Website
  48. 38:06Holster Choice for a BBQ Gun (Leather vs. Kydex)
  49. 39:43Call-in: Benny on BBQ Guns & Ammo Ban
  50. 40:08ATF Proposed Ban on SS19 M865 Ammo
  51. 40:52ATF Reclassifying 223/5.56 Green Tip Ammo
  52. 41:44Obama Administration's Strategy on Gun Control
  53. 42:35Agency Regulations as Law
  54. 43:11Challenges to Stopping the Ammo Ban
  55. 43:27Public Relations Aspect of Ammo Ban
  56. 44:01Rifles Penetrating Soft Body Armor
  57. 44:09Closing Remarks & Call-in

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the outcome of the recent court case discussed on Gun Talk regarding handgun purchases?

A federal court ruled that the provision of the 1968 Gun Control Act prohibiting the interstate purchase of handguns is unconstitutional. This means individuals can now potentially buy handguns across state lines, similar to long guns, and take delivery in that state.

What legal standard did the court apply in striking down the interstate handgun purchase ban?

The court applied strict scrutiny, a high legal standard that requires the government to prove a compelling interest to justify infringing on constitutional rights. The government failed to demonstrate such an interest for the interstate handgun purchase ban.

How does the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) approach protecting gun rights?

SAF employs a 'stepping stones' litigation strategy, building upon previous court victories like Heller and McDonald. They file lawsuits to challenge restrictive laws, aiming to gradually dismantle them and establish stronger legal precedents for Second Amendment freedoms.

What is the significance of the 'strict scrutiny' standard in gun rights litigation?

Strict scrutiny is the most rigorous standard of judicial review. It requires the government to show an overwhelming, compelling interest to justify any law that infringes on fundamental rights, making it much harder for restrictive gun laws to withstand legal challenges.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Gun Talk Media

View all →