Why I Left The USCCA

Published on January 2, 2025
Duration: 17:10

The speaker, a former USCCA contractor, explains his departure due to dissatisfaction with USCCA's handling of two specific self-defense cases: Kayla Giles and Austin Cooley. He highlights concerns about USCCA dropping coverage prematurely and not providing clear answers. He has since partnered with Attorneys on Retainer (AOR), praising their immediate attorney-client privilege, comprehensive coverage for various scenarios including prohibited persons and gun-free zones, and their operational model as a law firm rather than an insurance company.

Quick Summary

The speaker left USCCA due to concerns over their handling of self-defense cases like Kayla Giles and Austin Cooley, where coverage was allegedly dropped prematurely. He now endorses Attorneys on Retainer (AOR), a law firm offering immediate attorney-client privilege and comprehensive coverage for gun owners, distinguishing it from insurance programs that may have more limitations.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction & Reason for Video
  2. 00:43Past Contract with USCCA
  3. 01:14The Kayla Giles Case
  4. 03:00The Austin Cooley Case
  5. 04:01Loss of Confidence in USCCA
  6. 04:53Stopping USCCA Sponsorships
  7. 06:02Contractual Obligations & Departure
  8. 06:26Researching New Coverage Options
  9. 06:45Partnering with Attorneys on Retainer (AOR)
  10. 07:14AOR's Strengths & Leadership
  11. 08:03AOR vs. Insurance Programs
  12. 09:48AOR's Legal Firm Model
  13. 10:37AOR Coverage Across States
  14. 11:18AOR's Broad Coverage Scope
  15. 13:03Specific Scenarios Covered by AOR
  16. 14:06New Confidence in Legal Defense
  17. 15:00Customer Testimonial Example
  18. 16:04Final Thoughts & Recommendation

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the speaker leave the USCCA?

The speaker left USCCA due to concerns over their handling of two specific self-defense cases, Kayla Giles and Austin Cooley, where USCCA allegedly dropped coverage prematurely and failed to provide clear answers, leading to a loss of confidence in their commitment to members.

What are the key differences between Attorneys on Retainer (AOR) and traditional insurance programs for self-defense coverage?

Attorneys on Retainer (AOR) operates as a law firm, offering immediate attorney-client privilege and comprehensive coverage for various scenarios, including prohibited persons and gun-free zones. Unlike insurance programs, AOR defends members as long as self-defense is established, avoiding the 'outs' that insurance companies may use.

What specific scenarios does Attorneys on Retainer (AOR) cover that other programs might not?

AOR covers a wide range of situations, including incidents involving prohibited persons, non-roster weapons, gun-free zones, expired permits, negligent discharges, impaired judgment (if acting in self-defense), and domestic violence scenarios, provided the act was in self-defense.

What is the speaker's recommendation for self-defense legal coverage?

The speaker strongly recommends Attorneys on Retainer (AOR), citing his own experience and research. He highlights their robust legal team, immediate attorney-client privilege, and comprehensive coverage as reasons for his endorsement, encouraging viewers to use his code for discounts.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News

View all →