Still Better than the XM7

Published on June 5, 2025
Duration: 13:41

This review of the FN SCAR 17 highlights its significant drawbacks, particularly its poor stock trigger, excessive reciprocating mass, and harsh recoil impulse that can damage optics. While acknowledging its reliability and accuracy potential, the reviewer emphasizes that substantial aftermarket modifications are necessary to make it a properly functioning and enjoyable battle rifle, arguing that its high price point is not justified without these fixes.

Quick Summary

The FN SCAR 17's stock configuration suffers from a poor trigger, excessive reciprocating mass, and a harsh recoil impulse that can damage optics. Essential aftermarket upgrades like an improved gas regulator, stronger recoil spring, and buffer pad are recommended to mitigate these issues and improve shootability.

Chapters

  1. 00:53Introduction: The SCAR 17
  2. 01:51SCAR 17 Technical Basics
  3. 02:02Barrel Specifications
  4. 02:18Barrel System Design
  5. 02:38Upper Receiver Construction
  6. 02:50Barrel Extension Screws
  7. 03:22Lower Receiver and Trigger
  8. 03:32Controls and Ambidexterity
  9. 03:50The SCAR 17 Trigger
  10. 04:11Stock Design and Aesthetics
  11. 04:34Worst Parts: Internal Mechanics
  12. 04:38Short-Stroke Piston System
  13. 04:52Bolt Carrier Weight
  14. 05:18Reciprocating Mass Issues
  15. 05:30Gas System Problems
  16. 06:06Internal Component Failures
  17. 06:24Recoil Impulse and Optics Damage
  18. 06:33Recoil Impulse Analysis
  19. 07:05Muzzle Brake Effectiveness
  20. 07:22Long-Term Issues and FN's Response
  21. 07:42Aftermarket Solutions
  22. 07:54Improved Gas Regulators (Discarder)
  23. 09:03Enhanced Recoil Springs & Buffers
  24. 09:41Hydraulically Buffered Carriers
  25. 10:08FN's Missed Opportunities
  26. 10:19Non-Reciprocating Charging Handle
  27. 10:32Shootability Focus
  28. 10:43Cost of Upgrades and Performance
  29. 11:08Current Configuration Performance
  30. 11:14Reliability and Accuracy
  31. 11:29Weight and Potential Updates
  32. 11:38Current Standing of the SCAR 17
  33. 11:49Enticing Options and Buyer Appeal
  34. 12:08Comparison to Cost-Competitive Options
  35. 12:13Final Verdict: Unimpressed as a Shooter

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main drawbacks of the stock FN SCAR 17?

The stock FN SCAR 17 suffers from a poor, heavy trigger (around 8.5 lbs), excessive reciprocating mass in its bolt carrier group, and a harsh recoil impulse that can damage optics. Its gas system is also poorly tuned, and internal components like the cam pin and end plate screws are prone to failure.

What aftermarket upgrades are recommended for the FN SCAR 17?

Essential aftermarket upgrades for the SCAR 17 include an improved gas regulator (like the KN&S Discarder) for better tuning, an enhanced recoil spring, and a rubber buffer pad. For further improvement, a hydraulically buffered lightweight carrier is recommended to reduce reciprocating mass and recoil punishment.

How does the SCAR 17's recoil compare to other .308 rifles?

The SCAR 17's recoil impulse is described as obnoxious and 'wobbly wobbly wave,' significantly worse than most AR-10 platforms. This is attributed to its heavy bolt carrier group and the way the system cycles, leading to a less direct and pleasant shooting experience.

Is the FN SCAR 17 worth its high price tag?

The reviewer suggests that in its stock configuration, the SCAR 17 is overpriced and not worth its cost due to significant performance flaws. Substantial investment in aftermarket parts is required to make it function properly, bringing the total cost much higher.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from FocusTripp

View all →