Why You Shouldn't Buy a .50 BMG (Nutnfancy POU)

Published on April 28, 2023
Duration: 63:23

This video provides a comprehensive 'Philosophy of Use' (POU) discussion on the .50 BMG cartridge, primarily from the perspective of a novice shooter who has extensively tested the Barrett M82A1. The presenter, a retired Lieutenant Colonel, emphasizes that while the .50 BMG has impressive range and anti-material capabilities, its practical application for civilians is significantly limited by cost, weight, and the availability of specialized military-grade ammunition. The video delves into the cartridge's historical military applications, its ballistic performance compared to other calibers, the substantial financial investment required for ownership, and its limitations in terms of size and weight, concluding that it is best suited for specific roles and often requires a team for effective deployment.

Quick Summary

The .50 BMG cartridge, while possessing impressive range and anti-material capabilities, is often not practical for civilian ownership due to its extreme cost, significant weight, and the limited availability of specialized ammunition. Its true potential is unlocked with military-grade rounds, making standard FMJ loads less 'magical' than perceived, and its size often necessitates a crew for deployment.

Chapters

  1. 00:01Introduction to .50 BMG
  2. 00:08Philosophy of Use Discussion
  3. 00:14The .50 BMG Cartridge
  4. 00:17Fantasies vs. Reality
  5. 00:40Project Investment and Learning
  6. 00:56Ammunition: XM33 FMJ Load
  7. 01:04Novice Perspective on .50 BMG
  8. 01:12Shooting Experience: 400 Rounds
  9. 01:24Barrett M82A1 Platform
  10. 01:35Changed Perspective on .50 BMG
  11. 01:53POU Video Scope and Length
  12. 02:39Cost and Worthwhile Considerations
  13. 03:03Touchstone Piece for .50 BMG Reviews
  14. 03:12Testing Expenses and Time Commitment
  15. 03:28The 'Sexy' Cartridge Appeal
  16. 03:35Media Representation of .50 BMG
  17. 04:03Civilian Dreams of .50 BMG
  18. 04:082500 Meter Capability
  19. 04:17Military Applications of .50 BMG
  20. 04:53Canadian Sniper Kill: 2.2 Miles
  21. 05:04McMillan Tac-50 Rifle
  22. 06:02Other Long-Range Kills
  23. 06:27Experience with .338 Lapua Magnum
  24. 07:08Carlos Hathcock and M2 Browning
  25. 07:12Historical Sniper Round Reputation
  26. 07:36POU: Power, Range, Cost, SAWC, Purpose
  27. 08:06Opinion Change After Testing
  28. 08:15Recoil and Concussion
  29. 08:39Recoil Comparison
  30. 08:50Loss of 'Sexiness' with FMJ
  31. 09:01Steel Target Performance
  32. 09:15.50 BMG as a 'Large .30-06'
  33. 09:31Comparison to Russian 12.7
  34. 09:50Penetration Capabilities
  35. 09:59Civilian Limitations vs. Military Loads
  36. 10:27Specialized Military Rounds (API, API-T, SLAP)
  37. 11:05Bullet Payload and Design
  38. 11:17750 Grain A-Max Bullet
  39. 11:32Civilian Ammunition Limitations
  40. 11:50Analogy to 5.7x28mm
  41. 12:17Purpose of a .50 BMG Round
  42. 12:25Designed as a Multi-Purpose System
  43. 12:44Energy of XM33 Load
  44. 12:54Steel Plate Test at 850 Yards
  45. 13:31Opinion Piece: Not Overly Impressed
  46. 13:42Comparison to Small Artillery
  47. 13:53Military Loads vs. Civilian Loads
  48. 14:00Power and Range Discussion
  49. 14:042500 Meter Capability
  50. 14:11Long Range Shooting Experience
  51. 14:31Civilian Ownership and Shooting Frequency
  52. 14:44M82 Accuracy Assessment
  53. 15:16750 Grain A-Max Ballistics
  54. 15:50Ballistics Data Presentation
  55. 16:10Caliber Comparison: 308, .338 Lapua, .50 BMG
  56. 16:34KISS Principle in Ballistics
  57. 16:36.308 Winchester Ballistics
  58. 17:11.338 Lapua Magnum Ballistics
  59. 17:36Nosler 300 Grain Bullet
  60. 18:13.50 BMG FMJ Load Ballistics
  61. 18:53Hornady A-Max .50 BMG Ballistics
  62. 19:26Math Conclusion: Potent Long-Range Cartridge
  63. 19:46Capability Past 1000 Yards
  64. 19:58Importance of a Good Scope
  65. 20:01Power and Range: Standoff Capability
  66. 20:06The 'Sexiness' of .50 BMG
  67. 20:20Damage Potential
  68. 20:25Critique of Overhyped Power Claims
  69. 20:41Comparison to Other Calibers
  70. 20:50Message: Not Magical Without Military Bullets
  71. 20:57Gun Banners and Civilian Ownership
  72. 21:04Cannot Ban a .50 BMG Effectively
  73. 21:13Lethality Comparison
  74. 21:19Moral Citizen Argument
  75. 21:36Upside Down World of Gun Perception
  76. 22:05Favoring Civilian .50 BMG Ownership
  77. 22:24Rant: Constitutionality and Ownership
  78. 22:29Attention Grabbing Nature of .50 BMG
  79. 22:48Non-Suppressed Barrett M82 Loudness
  80. 22:52Muzzle Device Comparison
  81. 23:08Shooting on Private Land
  82. 23:23Law Enforcement Response
  83. 23:53Attention and Cost Considerations
  84. 24:00Suppressor Cost and Registration
  85. 24:20Range and Backdrop Requirements
  86. 24:47Round Travel Distance
  87. 25:03Backdrop Safety
  88. 25:24Limitations for Civilians
  89. 25:32Public Land Shooting Considerations
  90. 25:45Thousand Yard Range Availability
  91. 26:06Cost of .50 BMG
  92. 26:11Ammunition Purchase History
  93. 26:28Donor Support for Ammunition
  94. 26:37Ammunition Stockpiling
  95. 27:24Reluctance to Spend on Ammunition
  96. 27:43Recent Ammunition Purchases
  97. 27:50Thousands of Dollars Investment
  98. 27:57Reloading Considerations
  99. 28:27Reloading Complexity and Cost
  100. 28:38Bullet Availability for Reloading
  101. 28:54Ready-Made Ammunition Costs
  102. 29:27Shipping Costs for Heavy Ammunition
  103. 30:05Availability of .50 BMG
  104. 30:15Local Gun Store Inventory
  105. 30:34Planning and Lead Time for Ammunition
  106. 30:40Storage of .50 BMG Ammunition
  107. 30:46.50 Caliber Ammo Cans
  108. 30:52Surplus Linked Ammunition
  109. 31:09Steel Plate Testing with Surplus Ammo
  110. 31:16Ammunition Brands
  111. 31:25Need for Planning and Spending
  112. 31:37Cost of .50 BMG Firearms
  113. 31:40Barrett M82A1 New Condition Cost
  114. 31:52AR-50A1 Cost and Production Status
  115. 32:15Other .50 BMG Platform Costs (M107A1, Desert Tech, Robar, McMillan, Barrett M95)
  116. 32:45Firearm Availability and Mail Ordering
  117. 33:07Realistic Cost Assessment
  118. 33:16Total Cost of Ownership
  119. 33:19Optics Budget for .50 BMG
  120. 33:38Case Requirements for .50 BMG
  121. 33:42Barrett Case Cost
  122. 33:51Field Stripping Considerations
  123. 34:22Case Finding Challenges
  124. 34:35Vehicle Transportability
  125. 34:43Additional Accessories: Magazines
  126. 35:06Trigger Issues and Modifications
  127. 35:13Trigger Job Service
  128. 35:21Accumulating Costs
  129. 35:26Estimated Total Investment
  130. 35:41Ammunition Stockpiling Rationale
  131. 35:51SAWC: Size and Weight Constraints
  132. 36:00Weight of the Barrett M82A1
  133. 36:29.50 BMG as a Crew-Served Weapon
  134. 36:37Maneuverability Challenges
  135. 36:50Movie Depictions vs. Reality
  136. 37:09Team Effort for Deployment
  137. 37:21Semi-Auto vs. Bolt-Action Weight
  138. 37:29McMillan Tac-50 Weight
  139. 37:37Typical Firearm Weight
  140. 37:45Built-in Bipod and Monopod
  141. 37:51Ammunition Weight Calculation
  142. 38:10Magazine Weight
  143. 38:17Weight vs. Firepower Trade-off
  144. 38:44Historical Weight Consistency
  145. 39:00Loadout Weight Example
  146. 39:22Readiness for Heavy Loads
  147. 39:28Vehicle Transport for Deployment
  148. 39:54Application Limitations for Civilians
  149. 40:04Impact on System Capability
  150. 40:15Team Requirement for Deployment
  151. 40:24Discussion on Urban Environments
  152. 40:48Anti-Material Capabilities
  153. 40:55Long Range Open Country Gun
  154. 41:03Need for Support and Spotter
  155. 41:14Team Rifle Concept
  156. 41:20Purpose of .50 Caliber Rifle
  157. 41:28Ownership for Fun
  158. 41:38Collector Piece Appeal
  159. 42:21Typical Ownership Cycle
  160. 42:49Reality of Most .50 BMG Purchases
  161. 42:54Valid Reason: Collectibility and Fun
  162. 43:15Military Application: Anti-Material Cartridge
  163. 43:35Best Suited for Anti-Material Role
  164. 43:39Accuracy Limitations of M82 Platform
  165. 43:47Damage to Military Targets
  166. 44:16Asterisk for Military Loadings
  167. 44:25FMJ Load Effectiveness
  168. 44:36Devastating Impact
  169. 44:39Engaging Light Vehicles
  170. 44:52Defeating .50 BMG with Armor
  171. 45:06FMJ Load vs. Armor
  172. 45:14Military Vehicle Resistance (Apache)
  173. 45:31Round Not Magical
  174. 45:35Material Target Defeat Capability
  175. 45:46Vehicle Disablement
  176. 45:56Radiator and Engine Block Hits
  177. 46:11Armor for Engine Compartments
  178. 46:25Anti-Material Role Effectiveness
  179. 46:33Sniping Enemy Personnel
  180. 46:43Hurt Locker Depiction
  181. 47:07Bolt-Action .50 BMG as Sniper Platform
  182. 47:17High BC Load for Sniping
  183. 47:19Caveat: Experience and Training
  184. 47:35Military Training Context
  185. 47:49Canadian Sniper Kill Analysis
  186. 48:11Skill, Experience, and Luck
  187. 48:22Bad Guy Dispatcher
  188. 48:38Historical Capability
  189. 48:46.50 BMG Sniper Team Support System
  190. 48:58Military Support Structure Analogy
  191. 49:39Civilian 'Without Rule of Law' Application
  192. 49:53Recommendation for Moral Citizens
  193. 50:06No Difference from Other Calibers (for moral citizens)
  194. 50:21Misuse Potential
  195. 50:30Anti-Material Purpose in Extreme Scenarios
  196. 50:43Downsides and Realities
  197. 50:53Fantasy vs. Reality of Deployment
  198. 51:05Difficulty of Setup and Readiness
  199. 51:08Military Proven Capability
  200. 51:12FMJ Load Limitations
  201. 51:17Continuing Discussion: Purpose
  202. 51:23Purpose Focus: Competition
  203. 51:27FCSA (Fifty Caliber Association)
  204. 51:44Competitors as True Experts
  205. 51:53Military vs. Competitor Experience
  206. 52:05Competitors' Platform Knowledge
  207. 52:27Ownership for Fun and Competition
  208. 52:49FCSA Events and Ranges
  209. 53:17Legitimacy of Competitors
  210. 53:23Learning from Competitors
  211. 53:31Need for Experience and Time
  212. 53:46Competing with an M82
  213. 53:58Learning in the Field
  214. 54:06Valid Reason: Competition and Fun
  215. 54:09Shooting for Fun: Exceptions
  216. 54:21Ammunition Bill Deterrent
  217. 54:53Advocacy for Joining FCSA
  218. 55:04FCSA Membership Size
  219. 55:08High Entry Cost Barrier
  220. 55:35High Entry Fee Filters Owners
  221. 55:42Mexican Cartel Use
  222. 55:53Incidences in the States
  223. 56:01High Quality Owners
  224. 56:08Legality in Most States
  225. 56:10California Ban on .50 BMG
  226. 56:17Ronnie Barrett's Stance on California
  227. 56:38Constitutional and Pro-2A Stance
  228. 56:44Concluding Thoughts
  229. 56:53Ergonomics of .50 BMG
  230. 57:00Shooting Big, Heavy Guns
  231. 57:07Shouldering vs. Bipod Use
  232. 57:13Need for Support
  233. 57:23Prone Shooting Considerations
  234. 57:27Bog Pod Compatibility
  235. 57:45Loudness Without a Suppressor
  236. 57:51Eardrum Impact and Bystanders
  237. 58:06Concussion, Noise, Blast
  238. 58:11Dust Kick-up
  239. 58:14Managing Dust and Debris
  240. 58:36Next Level Ergonomics
  241. 58:53Recoil in Single-Shot Platforms
  242. 59:14Suppressor Considerations
  243. 59:19Suppressor Benefits
  244. 59:31Suppressor Cost and Registry
  245. 60:07Government Registration Concerns
  246. 60:27SAWC and Suppressor Weight
  247. 60:39Shooting Uncorked
  248. 60:42Conclusion of Video
  249. 60:59Summary of Topics Covered
  250. 61:14Helping Viewers Make Decisions
  251. 61:16Recap: Power, Range, Cost, SAWC, Purpose
  252. 61:32Places to Shoot and Ergonomics
  253. 61:37Thanks to Donors
  254. 61:41Donor Payment Method Check
  255. 61:51Joining as a Patron
  256. 62:04Monetization and Purchases
  257. 62:11Thanks to Gunnies Gun Store
  258. 62:15Loan of Barrett M82A1
  259. 62:21Upcoming Review
  260. 62:28Final Sign-off

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main reasons civilians fantasize about owning a .50 BMG rifle?

Civilians often fantasize about owning a .50 BMG rifle due to its impressive range (capable of 2500 meters), its 'sexy' appearance, and its representation in media as a powerful weapon. The idea of having significant standoff capability and the sheer presence of such a large caliber firearm contribute to its allure.

What are the practical limitations for civilians owning a .50 BMG rifle?

Practical limitations include the extremely high cost of the firearm and ammunition, the substantial weight and size making it difficult to maneuver (often requiring a crew), limited availability of specialized ammunition, and the significant noise generated. These factors restrict its use to specific scenarios and infrequent shooting.

How does the .50 BMG perform against targets with standard civilian FMJ ammunition?

With standard civilian Full Metal Jacket (FMJ) ammunition, the .50 BMG's performance is less 'magical' than often perceived. While it possesses significant energy, it may not 'shred' steel targets as expected and its penetration capabilities at distance are limited compared to military-grade rounds. It's more akin to a large .30-06 in this context.

What are the primary military applications of the .50 BMG cartridge?

Militarily, the .50 BMG is primarily used as an anti-material cartridge. Its roles include disabling light vehicles, radar equipment, aircraft on the ramp, and other facilities. While it has been used for long-range personnel engagements, this is often with specialized ammunition and highly trained snipers.

What is the estimated cost of acquiring and maintaining a .50 BMG rifle system?

Acquiring a .50 BMG rifle system can easily cost $10,000-$20,000 or more when factoring in the firearm itself (e.g., Barrett M82A1 around $10k), high-quality optics ($2k), ammunition ($5-$10 per round), cases, and accessories. Ammunition costs alone make frequent shooting prohibitively expensive.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from nutnfancy

View all →