Será que um colete à prova de balas realmente te protege? (Participação: AR de US$ 250)

Published on September 13, 2025
Duration: 1:08

This video tests the effectiveness of a Level IV C2 MH ballistic vest and a Level IIIA Fast Cut helmet against rapid-fire 30-round bursts from a budget AR-15 at 75 feet. The results indicate a high probability of being hit in areas not covered by the vest, such as the abdomen and pelvis, when the shooter is not precisely aiming at the vest itself. The test highlights the importance of understanding coverage limitations of personal protective equipment.

Quick Summary

A Level IV C2 MH ballistic vest and Level IIIA Fast Cut helmet were tested against rapid-fire AR-15 shots at 75 feet. The results showed a high probability of impacts in unprotected areas like the abdomen and pelvis, highlighting the limitations of body armor coverage when not precisely aimed at.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Bulletproof Vest Coverage
  2. 00:02Ballistic Vest: Level IV C2 MH
  3. 00:12Helmet: Fast Cut Level IIIA
  4. 00:20Data Collection Setup
  5. 00:26Test Setup: 75 Feet, 30 Shots
  6. 00:32Firearm: Budget AR-15
  7. 00:45Test Results: Impact Zones
  8. 00:50Analysis: Abdomen and Pelvis Hits
  9. 00:56Conclusion: Probability of Vest Hit

Frequently Asked Questions

What ballistic vest and helmet were tested in the video?

The video tested a Level IV C2 MH ballistic vest from República Blindada and a Level IIIA Fast Cut helmet from Grupo de Proteção Dinamarca. These were subjected to rapid-fire testing with a budget AR-15.

What was the testing distance and firearm used?

The ballistic vest and helmet were tested at a distance of 75 feet. The firearm used was a budget AR-15, described as a '250 silver version economic version', firing 30 rapid shots.

What were the key findings regarding vest coverage?

The test revealed that while the vest protects vital organs, it does not cover the neck or abdomen. A significant number of shots impacted these unprotected areas, indicating a high probability of being hit outside the vest's coverage.

How effective is body armor against general aiming?

The video suggests that when a shooter is generally aiming at a person, the probability of hitting areas not covered by body armor, such as the abdomen or pelvis, is 'incredibly high'.

Related News

All News →

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from Tática Civil

View all →