9Th Circuit: Huge 2A Decision Coming In PWGG v. Bonta

Published on June 27, 2026
Duration: 8:40

This video discusses the legal case PWGG v. Bonta, challenging California's ban on 18-20 year olds acquiring long guns. Oral arguments were heard by the 9th Circuit, with the Supreme Court's recent Wolfrid v. Lopez decision potentially impacting the outcome by clarifying standards for historical legal analysis under the Second Amendment. The Ninth Circuit has requested further briefing on how Wolfrid affects the case.

Quick Summary

The PWGG v. Bonta case challenges California's ban on 18-20 year olds acquiring long guns. The Supreme Court's Wolfrid v. Lopez decision now requires historical legal analogs to be similar in 'how' and 'why' they were enacted, impacting the analysis of modern gun laws and potentially influencing the outcome of this critical Second Amendment case.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction & 9th Circuit Criticism
  2. 00:43PWGG v. Bonta Case Overview
  3. 01:21Oral Arguments & Plaintiff's Case
  4. 02:12Hunting Permit Exemption & Bruin
  5. 02:48California's Defense & Judge's Bias
  6. 02:54The Twist: Wolfrid v. Lopez Decision
  7. 03:21Wolfrid's Impact on Historical Analogs
  8. 03:479th Circuit Asks for Wolfrid Briefs
  9. 04:11New Standard for Second Amendment Implication
  10. 04:59Conclusion & Future Outlook

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the PWGG v. Bonta case about?

PWGG v. Bonta is a legal challenge against California's law prohibiting individuals aged 18 to 20 from acquiring long guns. The case is backed by prominent Second Amendment organizations and is currently before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

How does the Supreme Court's Wolfrid v. Lopez decision affect gun rights cases like PWGG v. Bonta?

The Wolfrid v. Lopez ruling clarified that for a historical law to be a valid analog in Second Amendment cases, it must be similar in both 'how' and 'why' it was enacted, not just its superficial subject matter. This stricter standard impacts how courts evaluate historical justifications for modern gun regulations.

What is the significance of the 'shall issue' licensing regime mentioned in the PWGG v. Bonta case?

The 'shall issue' licensing regime refers to a system where a license must be granted if an applicant meets objective criteria. In PWGG v. Bonta, the court's focus on California's hunting permit exemption as a 'shall issue' mechanism suggests they might view it as compliant with Second Amendment standards, which is a point of contention.

What new standard did Wolfrid v. Lopez set for determining if a law implicates the Second Amendment?

Wolfrid v. Lopez established a three-part test: 1. Does the law apply to people (specifically voting-aged individuals)? 2. Does it involve arms (anything useful for offense or defense)? 3. Does it restrict keeping or bearing those arms? If all answers are 'yes,' the Second Amendment is implicated.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Copper Jacket TV

View all →