Bloomberg on Texas Church Shooting: Only Cops should have guns and decide when to shoot

Published on January 2, 2020
Duration: 4:48

This video, featuring commentary from Colion Noir, analyzes Michael Bloomberg's stance on gun control in the context of the Texas church shooting. Noir critiques Bloomberg's assertion that only law enforcement should be armed, highlighting perceived hypocrisy and questioning the effectiveness of relying solely on police for immediate protection. The discussion touches on civilian training versus police training and the legal duty of police to protect individuals.

Quick Summary

Colion Noir critiques Michael Bloomberg's gun control advocacy, particularly after the Texas church shooting. Noir questions Bloomberg's "police-only" armament stance, citing the Supreme Court ruling that police have no constitutional duty to protect individuals and highlighting Bloomberg's own use of armed security.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Gun Control vs. Government Control
  2. 00:27Bloomberg's "Cops Only" Stance
  3. 01:30Civilian vs. Police Training
  4. 02:01Police Duty to Protect Ruling
  5. 02:35Bloomberg's Hypocrisy & Security
  6. 03:10Johns Hopkins Security Debate
  7. 03:51Comparing Gun Control Positions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Michael Bloomberg's stance on gun ownership?

Michael Bloomberg advocates for strict gun control, famously stating that only law enforcement should possess firearms and decide when to use them. He has also expressed the view that individuals who want guns in their homes are "pretty stupid."

What was the significance of the Texas church shooting in this discussion?

The Texas church shooting served as a focal point for discussing gun control. It highlighted the actions of a civilian, Jack Wilson, who intervened to stop the shooter, prompting critiques of Bloomberg's "police-only" gun stance.

Does police have a constitutional duty to protect individuals?

According to a New York Times article referenced in the video, a Supreme Court ruling established that police do not have a constitutional duty to protect individuals. This raises questions about relying solely on law enforcement for immediate safety.

What hypocrisy is attributed to Michael Bloomberg regarding firearms?

Critics point to Michael Bloomberg's personal security detail, which includes armed bodyguards, and his alleged advocacy for armed private security forces at Johns Hopkins University, contrasting with his public stance against private gun ownership.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Colion Noir

View all →