Breaking: Major Court Filing Exposes Pure Ignorance to Uphold Ban
This video analyzes the legal arguments presented in the Heater v. James case concerning New York's ban on body armor. It highlights the defendants' claims that body armor is not an 'arm' as understood in 1791 or 1868, contrasting this with historical dictionary definitions and Supreme Court interpretations from Heller v. District of Columbia, which suggest a broader understanding of 'arms' and the applicability of the Second Amendment to arms not in existence at the founding.










