Connecticut Supreme Court Rules Remington Can Be Sued Over Newtown Shooting

Published on March 15, 2019
Duration: 5:55

The Connecticut Supreme Court has ruled that Remington can be sued over the Newtown shooting, allowing victims' families to proceed. This decision bypasses federal immunity for gun manufacturers, focusing on alleged irresponsible marketing of the AR-15. The ruling is seen by some as a strategic move by gun control advocates to erode personal responsibility and financially pressure the firearms industry through litigation.

Quick Summary

The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled that Remington can be sued over the Newtown shooting, allowing victims' families to proceed. This decision bypasses federal immunity for gun manufacturers, focusing on alleged irresponsible marketing of the AR-15. The ruling is seen as a strategic move to shift blame and potentially burden the industry through litigation.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Connecticut Supreme Court Ruling
  2. 00:32Marketing Liability Loophole
  3. 01:12Critique of Personal Accountability
  4. 01:45Legal Strategy and Discovery
  5. 03:36Precedent for Accessory Manufacturers
  6. 04:47Inspiration for Copycat Lawsuits

Frequently Asked Questions

Can gun manufacturers be sued for crimes committed with their products?

Generally, under federal law like PLCAA, gun manufacturers have immunity. However, the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled Remington can be sued over the Newtown shooting, focusing on alleged irresponsible marketing of the AR-15, creating a potential exception.

What is the significance of the Connecticut Supreme Court's ruling on Remington?

This ruling is significant because it allows victims' families to sue Remington, bypassing the typical immunity granted to gun manufacturers under federal law. The case will proceed based on how the rifle was marketed.

How does the lawsuit against Remington differ from typical product liability cases?

The lawsuit against Remington focuses on the marketing of the AR-15, alleging promotion of 'hyper-masculinity' and combat features. The court is allowing a jury to decide if this marketing was irresponsible, which is a specific angle beyond standard product defects.

What are the potential long-term implications of this ruling for the firearms industry?

This ruling could set a precedent for future lawsuits against gun manufacturers and accessory companies, potentially leading to costly litigation and discovery processes that gun control advocates might use to access internal company information.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Colion Noir

View all →