The Truth Behind Remington's $73 Million Settlement With Sandy Hook Survivors

Published on February 17, 2022
Duration: 11:51

This analysis delves into the $73 million settlement between Remington and Sandy Hook survivors, dissecting the legal strategies employed to bypass PLCAA. It highlights how Connecticut's unfair trade practices law was leveraged by focusing on Remington's AR-15 marketing, which plaintiffs argued was irresponsibly targeted. The video emphasizes that the settlement was driven by insurance companies, not the firearms industry directly, and questions the stated goal of industry change versus the admission of no liability.

Quick Summary

The $73 million settlement between Remington and Sandy Hook survivors bypassed PLCAA by using Connecticut's unfair trade practices laws. Plaintiffs argued Remington's AR-15 marketing was irresponsibly targeted at young men as 'killing machines.' The settlement was funded by insurance companies, not the firearms industry directly.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Remington Sandy Hook Settlement Overview
  2. 01:16Plaintiffs' Attorney Motivations and Fees
  3. 02:00PLCAA and Legal Immunity Myths
  4. 03:00The Connecticut Advertising Loophole
  5. 04:38Gun Industry Financial Realities
  6. 06:33Insurance Companies Forced the Settlement
  7. 08:45Settlement vs. Forcing Industry Change

Frequently Asked Questions

How did the Sandy Hook lawsuit bypass the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA)?

The lawsuit bypassed PLCAA by leveraging Connecticut state laws regarding unfair trade practices. Plaintiffs argued that Remington's marketing of the AR-15 was irresponsibly targeted towards young men as 'killing machines,' a claim the Connecticut Supreme Court allowed to proceed.

Who actually funded the $73 million settlement between Remington and Sandy Hook survivors?

The settlement was primarily funded by insurance companies, not directly by the firearms industry. Remington Outdoor Company's assets had already been sold in bankruptcy, meaning the lawsuit proceeded against the estate's insurance policies.

What is the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA)?

PLCAA, passed in 2005, was designed to prevent frivolous lawsuits intended to bankrupt gun manufacturers. It does not provide blanket immunity but allows manufacturers to be sued for defective products.

What was the alleged marketing issue that led to the Remington settlement?

Plaintiffs argued that Remington's marketing of the AR-15 was irresponsibly geared towards young men, portraying it as a 'killing machine.' This specific marketing approach was central to the legal strategy that bypassed PLCAA.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Colion Noir

View all →